AlternativePerspective
You can’t possibly compare New Zealand to any of the European countries.
For one, New Zealand has a population of just 5 million people and is spread out. There isn’t a huge amount of movement to and from, so closing the borders was easy compared to any of the European countries.
Yes, very unfair! 
Take Norway, whose population isn't all that much bigger than New Zealand's but in a much smaller area. (Set against that, Norwegians socially distancing almost all the time virus or no virus: the joke from a Norwegian friend goes that when they were told they no longer had to distance to two metres, Norwegians said "oh thank God for that, now we can go back to the normal sixteen metres"...)
New Zealand: population 5,002,100 ; total cases 1,848; deaths 25; number of cases per million 369; deaths per million 5; tests per million of population 194,047.
Norway: population 5,431,948; total cases 14,149; deaths 274; number of cases per million 2,605; deaths per million 50; tests per million of population 196,125.
Norway did fairly well for a European country, but had the disadvantage of a couple of land borders, one of them with a country which has a similar population and other statistics (Finland) but the other with one which has about twice the population and wasn't taking many precautions for a long time apart from telling people there to "be sensible" (oh Sweden...)