So I’m genuinely wondering whether I am being unreasonable. I’ll explain but I’m also trying not to make this too long!
STBXH and I have 3 DC. Two of them do a sporting activity once a week and need to be picked up and brought back to my house. I asked him if he’d do this every week rather than us alternating it every other week.
I’d suggested it on the basis that he’d said he wanted to take a greater part in looking after them.
The balance of us looking after them is like this:
Every other weekend at our respective homes. DC1 and DC2 stay at mine every school night, DC3 stays at his 2 school nights out of 5. This is basically what they’ve chosen, works best for them as regards school.
Dinner made by paid child care person 2 days, 1 day by me, 1 day by him, then we alternate weeks for the 5th day.
I work 4 days a week and cover all expenses for the DCs including paid childcare, school uniform, clubs, clothes etc. STBXH covers costs (food, obviously, fun activities) when they are with him but doesn’t contribute financially otherwise. He says he can’t afford it.
So basically I feel that I have more burden of the “drudge work” just associated with having the DCs those extra days - they are lovely of course but they still need chivvying to get ready, refereeing arguments etc, and I have more of that. I also do most of the kidmin - not least because it’s me paying for it all. And I’m working pretty hard to pay for the stuff too.
Therefore I thought it would be fair for him to take on that pick-up every week as it would balance things up a bit. (Paid child care person drops them off so we don’t need to do that).
But he seems outraged almost. He said:
“No. That’s not the sort of thing that is beneficial to anyone. I need more quality time with the [DCs], not a few snatched minutes in the car when they are generally tired and uncommunicative. Those journeys don’t count.”
I feel (a) it all counts and (b) it’s not just about what he needs. But I’d appreciate opinions.
PS please don’t be too mean 