Aridane
"If I give my child a vaccine and he or she then has a reaction which causes damage, that is my fault: it happened because of something that I did.
"If I don't give my child a vaccine and he or she then has a disease which causes damage, that is not my fault: it didn't happen because of something that I did."
You see, I would think completely the opposite
Oh, me too, but I am unsure we mean the same thing by "the opposite".
The urge not to be to blame for anything that goes wrong (and that words "what did I do to deserve this?") is strong in many. I didn't say it was sensible to assume that not having a child vaccinated when there was no medical reason not to was doing the best for it; I said it might have a specific cause.
or to quote my own post:
That is completely nonsensical when you actually stop and look at it, but it is the gut feeling some people are certainly going to have. Better to do nothing and run a risk, than do something and run a far lesser risk; it's a very standard human reaction, that one, better the devil you know. It is why people go on living on the slopes of volcanoes: it may not happen, and if it does, well, it isn't their fault.