I'm not an EP but actually tbh parts of your EP's report reads as a bit of a wish list of what they feel needs to happen for your DS for him to reach NT appearance and fit mainstream school.
In itself it may not actually be right or the right route for him, depending on what's really going on. I'd be deeply unhappy with a lot in that report, myself.
But for it to mean anything, how each of those targets/needs could and should be met, and how the success or failure of them should be judged and over what period of time, and by whom, is what needs to be focused on if it's to be meaningful.
Cognition and Learning
- He needs to develop his ability to attend to and learn from the educator’s teaching model;
Interesting that the EP identifies a need to fit the child to the education model rather than the other way round...
The 'educator's teaching model' may (or may not) be entirely inappropriate for the child's learning needs.
Example (from RL) educators teaching model for touch typing was Mavis Beacon Program - a two handed ten fingered program with expected timed progression.
Child with CP and use of 3.5 fingers on one hand and vague thumb use on other, failed the inadequate teaching model for years before we met and it came out how he was being taught.
In the old days, following the text with your finger as it was read aloud was how we learned to recognize words in class. (See and say model) That 'educators teaching model' automatically failed deaf and many hard of hearing children as well as the dyslexic, who were labelled as having lowered intelligence as a result.
My ASD DC couldn't access the standard school 'teaching model' and the older they got, the further behind they fell despite a high IQ. Conversation with GOSH pointed us to discovering DC needed a non linear teaching method, and discrete teaching in some subjects, to reach their potential. (total about turn once taught to the condition) Also utterly unsuited to understanding of group membership so that he recognises and settles into basic classroom routines. If we'd gone down that route to achieve that, it would have been disastrous. (accepting concepts of 'group membership only started getting through in their teens)
- He needs to access a group learning activity and make progress in line with his ability.
At 5 mine couldn't have done both of those things simultaneously, and the inability to do the first, meant the second couldn't be achieved.
Where is your dc's measured ability? How would you know if they were in line with their personal ability? Has there been an IQ test and a way of testing their strengths and weaknesses?
I'd strongly advise you do a bit of a restart here and gather all your paperwork and talk to IPSEA.