they are more likely to be stopped, compared to national statistics, by living in an area where more crime is committed
For many years, I lived in a part of Croydon that regularly had the highest crime rate in the borough. It also had a very high rate of "sus" searches and was a racially mixed area.
I often walked home very late at night, from time to time worked in a pub where a fair few of the regulars were active criminals and kept some decidedly dodgy company. On one occasion, I was walking home while a racially-motivated murder took place within a quarter of a mile of the house I'd been visiting.
But I never got stopped, regardless of whether I was on foot or driving, pissed or sober, alone or with friends. I wonder why that was?
It could have been because I'm female. But none of my white male friends ever got stopped either, yet I would see the police searching young black men on a regular basis.
I'd really like to see the figures for police stops broken down by ward and by ethnicity. If being present in a high crime area is the reason for stopping people, the ethnicity of those searched should broadly reflect that of the area.
I think that data shoudl be gathered and published. If the police aren't racist, they can afford to be transparent. And if they are racially profiling, there will be some empirical evidence and measures can be put in place to stop it.