@SunshineSusan14
My opinion is that you can't make a movement one size fits all, but you can't remove what 'all lives matter' might mean to this woman.
For whatever reason, the message 'Black Lives Matter' doesn't resonate with everyone. For some, it even alienates them. Including some people who it should include as supporters, or even passive non-objectors. That's bad for the cause.
It also has, in my opinion, an unhealthy effect on the mentality of those within the movement. It creates a space where only the issue is of importance - you can actually see that in certain media spaces. (see Buzzfeed, where there are many many examples of BLM supporters pushing out other POC's experiences, badgering non-black voices for supporting the cause in the wrong way, instructing people to 'educate themselves' without supplying referenced material etc).
Like I said upthread, you're fighting a losing battle if your cause is predicated on shutting down anything that doesn't fit with devotion to the approved central narrative (which, by the way, doesn't even exist in the first place in a single form, because guess what, we all have our own perspectives and black people are no more all the same than white people).
Life doesn't work like that. People don't work like that.
My degree and research specialism is in post-genocidal community reconciliation. Aka how to reconcile human beings who have suffered the very worst that other human beings can inflict on them. Trauma on an unimaginable scale. (Someone once asked me why I didn't brighten up my research with more images... of genocide...). And the current BLM protests and movement bear very little resemblance to any successful model of reparation and reconciliation that I have studied.