@CountessFrog You put the point so beautifully, I won’t even try to add to it, but it’s such a succinct description. I wonder, on the back of this, what you make of ‘sorry day’ if they (you?) still mark that?
I understand the saying sorry- especially for the stolen generation which was a terrible event (even if it wasn't intended to be terrible). That said, I don't think there is any advantage to marking sorry day, or calling Australia Day 'invasion day'.
The reality is that aboriginal life wasn't all lovely until the Europeans came along- there was no influenza or alcohol, for sure. But that didn't mean that aboriginal culture didn't have the same weaknesses then as it does now, and that if things like life expectancy are worth anything, then those have improved (even if not as much as they should have).
It is important to acknowledge the problems caused by European settlement, but at the same time it wasn't like Australia was a land inhabited by a thriving people- aboriginal culture was tribal and nomadic. Agriculture was largely non existent and the life expectancy was (as it was for Europeans pre antibiotics & germ theory) in the 30s and 40s. Tribal and nomadic cultures don't maintain low populations because they're not having lots of children. It's because most of them die (in fact even today aboriginies have one of the higher birth rates).
However it was a culture suited to the geography and (importantly) the lack of fermented fruit. So it's a difficult thing- obviously there were downsides but also benefits. More importantly though is not to focus on why it's all terribly bad, but to look at the structural issues and try and address them going forward (I think things like abstudy is excellent for example even if it has a low uptake).