I think it's a sad indictment of this country that we blame the poor for being poor. Also that whole swathes of people on a decent wage are going to be plunged into poverty after the loss of a couple of months income (scary how many of even the 'middle classes' are apparently living hand to mouth). I think it'll shed light on some of the structural issues with our version of capitalism, but sadly the elephant in the room will go unchallenged.
Given that most benefits are paid to the working poor, we really need to look at why huge corporations aren't paying their employees enough to live on (or any corporation tax for that matter). Why are the government effectively subsidising the amazon, starbucks, tescos, etc of the world, by topping up their employee's wages, whilst these corps make a few people insanely rich?
Why are so many people angry at the poor who are fighting over the scraps (or have just given up having seen how fucking pointless it is) rather than the greedy fucks who are hoarding billions? For all of you angry at sharon with her 12 kids and council house, consider that the Jeff Bezos' of the world have taken many billions times more money out of the taxpayers pocket, and give your head a wobble.
There would be a lot more money in the pot for those who need it, if it weren't all being funnelled into making labour cheap for big corporations. If you want to be indignant, don't fall for the narritive that it's the poor that are the problem.
This isn't an anti Tory rant. This goes back at least as far as Tony Blair - 'New labour' did more to inhbit social mobility than even our current shower of shite, by supressing wages and forcing people that had never needed benefits before into the system.
The whole system has been corrupted to enrich a few, and they've somehow convinced the masses to blame those that have been most exploited.
And the rich aren't the ones that are going to suffer through the next few months, they'll go unscatehed and unchallenged, whilst taking even more of the pie for themselves.