Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To ask Tory voters what I do now.

434 replies

GailCindy · 13/12/2019 11:21

I have a son who has SEND issues. I am trained as a senior nursery practitioner and have done a lot of courses to back up my college NVQs so I can look after children with quite severe disabilities in a range of settings but I like nurseries. On paper I could get a job for about 25k quite easily.

My son is 14 and has SEND issues. I worked full time until he was 12 and half way in year 7 when it became impossible to work and be a mother to him. Over the past 3-4 years, his support in school has dwindled so he now gets 10% of what is on his EHCP and none of it is 1v1. It is all in small groups which is better than nothing but not if it is only for 2 of 25+ periods he has in a week. My son is not violent or disruptive in the usual way. He will become very anxious and have panic attacks if he feels overwhelmed in any way by his surroundings or work. This sometimes mean he will cry or become very withdrawn and unable to sit in lessons. Rarely he will explode but he wont hit other people. It will be closer to self harming. Also, for reasons related to his ASD, my son goes through uniform/clothes/shoes much faster than other kids his age. Quite a bit of his DLA goes on uniform where I buy at least one item a month. Often 2 items. Plus other clothes.

They wont let him take his phone to school. I was part of several parents across the country who tried to protest these rules locally and nationally but the education minister backed the schools with these rules. My son has to travel alone to and from school because I work* for a few hours per day. He can become overwhelmed by something unpredictable happening so not having any contact (not even by phone box as he cannot carry money) on his way to and from school is terrifying. Plus they issue same day detentions for up to an hour so I never know when he is leaving school. Same for a club or event. The Xmas auditions ran 1hour past time until 630pm and they did not tell parents so we were all wondering where our kids were. Nobody answering school phones and of course we cannot call the kids.

These two things with school always ringing me and him needing to be able to contact me means I cannot do my job. We are not allowed phones in the nursery and it is not practical for the school to ring the office as much as they try and contact me which can be every day.

I had a partner but we recently split because of money issues. We couldn't afford to be together legally and it is too hard to maintain separate homes and finances and feel like a couple. That is a friend with benefits.

A special school might be better for my son and I thought as much from year 7 but guess what? Cuts mean that because my son can do his work alright he isnt eligible for a special school. One man from LEA told me that special schools are for kids with brain damage in wheelchairs now and not kids who can write and read. All of those are moved into mainstream he told me.

So the cuts mean that my son has to go to the only school with autism unit which is defunct due to lack of funding but people have the knowledge of what should be done at least. However he gets no support there so they'll regularly need me to get him. Lack of funding also means that he cannot go to a special school because they are now for people more disabled than him.

All of these things mean I can only work 3 hours a day because the only feasible job I could find that just happens to be in my field was to do the mornings in a nursery as a NVQ level 2 employee. I meet him when I can but it would cost me £15 a week to do so unless I walked there which would take an hour out of the other things that need doing. Therefore I only meet him when it combines with some other task which makes the bus fare worthwhile. I still can't work in the afternoons though because I have to be "on call" for him. If he needs to be collected which he often does, even if it is at home time, they will not let him leave alone distressed or in a cab. So either me,his dad,or my recent ex has to collect him. His dad lives 150 miles away. My recent ex had to work all the hours God sends to provide for us all (he has kids himself). So it is me.

MY UC housing allowances does not cover my housing costs by £150 so that comes out of our living expenses. That's because the HLA is low, we are in private accommodation with no chance of local social housing for years and we need to live somewhere he can easily get to the places he needs to get to alone. This independence frankly means that he is more likely to put money back in society at some point. Moving would set us back and the nationwide shortage of services means that moving somewhere cheap and rural would mean he wouldn't get even the support he gets now.

Long story not so short we live on 100 pound a month ( including his DLA) after I've paid to not be evicted and to keep in contact with each other. That includes food, travel for me, clothes, treats, replacement furniture, everything. The only luxury we have according to budgeting sites is wifi but really my son would never pass his GCSEs if he didnt have good internet at home. Streaming off of a phone to laptop does not work well enough to access all the complex websites and programmes he has to use just to do compulsory homework. Good GSCEs means he will more likely earn money and pay taxes.

His dad gives CM but considering he has 6 dependents in his home, has bipolar and works "part time" according to them, it is barely enough for my son to have some pocket money for the trips he takes out with a social group of local SEND kids and the occasional treat related to his hobby which I use to get him to do stuff that he doesnt want to do and likely wont get support doing anyway because of the cuts. I mean things like completing assessments and exams. They freak him out big time.

I know this is pathetic and long but honestly AIBU to ask what do I do?

Every turn the Tories have cut off our options. I haven't bought a pair of knickers since last Xmas and they were from Primark and I'm literally praying someone buys me some this year because they are ripped and off colour. That is my life now. I'd love to go back to the job I trained so hard for given that I had a shit family who abused me and stopped me finishing school but the support just isn't there for me to leave my son. What do we do when BJ will just take more and more away and make it even harder for people like me who want to work but can't with such shit public services?

OP posts:
Teenangels · 14/12/2019 13:26

So after your rent is paid,and council tax you are still receiving your wages, child Benefit, Carers allowance and your son is getting DLA. I have worked that out to be about £800 a month? That seems like an ok amount

Seriouslyconfused3 · 14/12/2019 14:13

Can you confirm income and outgoings op? It’s all a bit confusing

GailCindy2 · 14/12/2019 14:30

He didnt have 3 more kids! She had 3 kids already. Then they had 2 pregnancies which made 3 kids. He claims his stepkids as dependents.

GailCindy2 · 14/12/2019 14:40

Oh sorry my wages are monthly like most people.

My rent is 420 per week inc. Service charge. Council Tax 20 per week. Electricity and gas is 20 per week. Expenses related to my son's needs come in at about 35 per week (clothes, taxis, shoes, school equipment, social life, incentives). Travel for me is about 10 per week depending on what I have to do. Those are the things that I pay every week. What I spend on food depends on what I have left.

I pay 1/4 of my rent approx as housing allowance is 100 less than private rent in my area for ex council flat. I wasnt able to get anywhere with social housing because I always worked since I had my son. They did help with deposit when he was little and that is how we have remained in the private sector. That was 12 nearly 13 years ago..

GailCindy2 · 14/12/2019 14:41

My rent is nearly 1700 per month inc service charge and I get 1200 per month housing allowance.

WhenWillThereBeGoodNewz · 14/12/2019 14:47

I'm sorry your son is being failed by the Tories and those who vote for them op.

GailCindy2 · 14/12/2019 14:58

Thanks for your kind words.

My goal here is to show Tory voters that their party is not designed to reward grafters like me. They want to keep us poor and keep us as a drain on society so there will always be people to point to and blame for being a burden. If they were interested in having productive citizens they would not stop SEND kids having the support they need to get employment and even earn the same as anyone else in some cases. Or more. The reasoning for taking away funding and support is to keep a poverty stricken underclass.

CrossingTheAlpsInOtley · 14/12/2019 15:07

But you are having almost all your rent paid, don't you think that is pretty generous? I do. Am I being unreasonable?

It just seems topsy turvy to me that anyone would complain about having to top up their own rent, while someone else pays the lion's share.

How much would make your life comfortable?

Fairenuff · 14/12/2019 15:08

When he got together with this woman, she already had 3 children. They became his step-children. So between them they had 3 children.

He then decided to add a fourth child into the family. And then they decided to have another one. Even thought he knows he can only work part time. So even without the surprise extra child, he definitely and knowingly signed up to 5 and as a direct result of that he can't pay for the 1 child he had with you

He is the problem here. He is a feckless man who has produced 4 children with no idea of how he is going to provide for them.

Grasspigeons · 14/12/2019 15:21

I have no idea why a man being feckless should have any impact of a childs access to SEN education. My child doesnt have a feckless father - am I allowed to complain about the year of school my child missed due to the well documented SEND funding that led to no special school places that year.

Fairenuff · 14/12/2019 15:34

OP has already been advised that the school have to provide what the child is entitled to on their EHCP. School says they don't have the staff. OP should take this further. She hasn't.

She needs to sort that out herself. Everything the child needs has already been agreed and the government is willing to pay for it. If OP lets it slide that's down to her, no-one can help her any more than what they have already advised.

If the feckless father provided for his child, OP would not be so skint.

Grasspigeons · 14/12/2019 15:40

Fairenuff - have you read the Education Select Committe Inquiry into SEND? That contains some conservative views on the current system. It was published in October. They manifesto have already earmarked more funding for certain areas because they conceede the system is broken and categorically failing children. So dont sit here saying OP can just use magic money to sue her local council through lenghty tribunal process and its her own fault if she doesnt. There are 8500 children in this country awaiting the soecialist providion detailed in their ehcp.

Fairenuff · 14/12/2019 15:45

OP has to follow this through if she wants anything to change for her child. Yes there are lots of people in the same position but they are not here asking for advice. If OP does nothing, nothing will change.

RaiseaGlasstoFreedom · 14/12/2019 15:52

I've only read the first op, without getting competitive over knickers, I was literally wearing black asda maternity knickers for 4 years after giving birth and only brought new (asda) when the holes in the crotch rendered wearing knickers at all pointless. That was after sewing up the crotch And colour was the least of my problems.

Grasspigeons · 14/12/2019 15:57

www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/education-committee/inquiries/parliament-2017/special-educational-needs-and-disability-inquiry-17-19/

Not everyone has the legal knowledge or social capital to navigate the system. This is highlighted in the summary and recommendations of the inquiry.

Jeremy Hunt said to a packed hall that LA dont have enough money to carry out their obligations which is why the government has committed more money to LAs but in his opinion they need to commit more and he is pushing for his constituency.

Blaming individuals for being victims of a broken system and not fighting hard enough is ridiculous. Access to public funds for education shouldnt be awarded to the most persistant parents.

Fairenuff · 14/12/2019 16:02

Where am I blaming her?

I do blame the feckless father for having more children when he couldn't provide for the existing one though.

No-one here can magically change OP's circumstances.

She can either start taking legal steps to help her child or not. If she doesn't then nothing will change and there's nothing any of us can do about it.

The government has said she can have the help for him. Schools have to provide it.

Teenangels · 14/12/2019 16:12

Op you have not disagreed with the amount I stated after you have paid you rent and Council tax you still have at least £850 a month, not the £100 you were saying.
I believe your intention was to shame the so called uncaring Tory voters but doing the sums you have more than most.

Grasspigeons · 14/12/2019 16:13

I am genuinley shocked that you feel a disabled childs access to education should be based on their parents capacity to legally fight for it and the solution is for her to fight, not to reform the system so it becomes lots of undividuals personal poroblem and personal responsibility rather than the principle of state education.

RunningAwaywiththeCircus · 14/12/2019 16:23

This reply has been withdrawn

Message from MNHQ: This post has been withdrawn

Fairenuff · 14/12/2019 16:28

I don't think it should be Grass, I am recognising that it is. That is the current situation OP is in. If she wants it to change she is going to have to change it.

KTheGrey · 14/12/2019 16:37

UC sounds like a horrible nightmare.

This is going to sound daft but have you contacted your MP?

Marleyisme · 14/12/2019 16:47

My goal here is to show Tory voters that their party is not designed to reward grafters like me. They want to keep us poor and keep us as a drain on society so there will always be people to point to and blame for being a burden.
But you havent. Be a6se you filled your op with half truths and irrelevant things.
You CAN afford to live with your (now ex) partner but it suited you both better, not to. And you dont actually want to live with him right now.

The problem is your sons school. That's it. Not all the other stuff.

Shoeshelpplease · 14/12/2019 16:52

OP sorry if I've missed it but did you answer my question re what you do with your time when you are on call for your son? If you can't work but your son only needs you occasionally?

Xenia · 14/12/2019 16:53

Good summary, Marley

Oliversmumsarmy · 14/12/2019 16:53

My goal here is to show Tory voters that their party is not designed to reward grafters like me

But you are not a grafter.

You work p/t at a nursery and seem to spend more time on the phone trying to be paid more money.

You say that you have tried all the suggestions. Does that mean you have tried mine?

Seeing your latest updates all I can see is someone who isn’t dealing with reality.

£1700 per month seems excessive even for London unless you are living in Chelsea or a really posh area.

I have friends who have a husband and 2 children who lived for years in a 1 bed flat because that is all they could afford.

Yes they would have liked a 2 bed flat but that wasn’t in their reality.

I also think you need to get out of the mindset of benefits being the be all and end all.
Everything you say about working is tempered with how much benefits you can claim or would lose.

Yes you could earn £25k per year working in a nursery f/t but atm you can’t. This isn’t your reality you have a Ds who needs you during the day.

Yes to trying to get the school to do more but blaming the way SENs is operated under the Tories is not taking on board that under Labour it was just as bad.
I had to take my Ds out of school to educate him. I gave up trying to get someone to listen to me.
What you describe isn’t unfamiliar to me.

I suggested working nights and having your estranged oh staying over to keep an eye on your Ds for a monthly “wage” would give you a job outside of daytime hours which is atm a problem given your Ds needing you during the day time.

You need to look at f/t night work then look at what extra benefits you can claim as well rather than starting with your benefits and then judging whether you can afford to add work in.

Then look at cheaper housing until you can get back on your feet.

If you are working f/t then you can have your pick of flats rather than being limited to the ones that accept HB

Swipe left for the next trending thread