I signed the petition against prorouging parliament primarily because I believe Parliament is an important part of our checks and balances and it shouldn't be dismissed when key decisions are being made. It sets a terrible precedent.
I received the response today. It is really long but the first 3 paragraphs are:
'Prorogation is a pregotative act of the crown exercised on the advice of ministers. We must respect the referendum result and the UK will be leaving the EU on the 31st October whatever the circumstances.
'The UK will be leaving the EU on the 31st October whatever the circumstances. We must respect the referendum result.
'Prorogation is a pregotative act of the crown exercised on the advice of ministers to bring about the end of the parliamentary session...'
It then goes on about the process, fixed term parliament and how this prorogation is to allow extra funding for the police and for schools.
AIBU to think that:
- The government have repeatedly said prorogation wasn't about Brexit so leaving on the 31st shouldn't have been mentioned at all, never mind twice in the first two paragraphs
- It's very badly written.
- It should have responded to the actual concern which is that the government shouldn't use tools like this to avoid the checks and balances that parliament provides. What if next time its parliament voting to stop a war?
'