Apologies for the rant in advance!
Currently on maternity leave with DD1, due to go back to work in September. Reducing from full time down to 4 days/32 hours.
We have a place for DD at a nursery next to work, fees circa £50 a day. DPs parents live a few miles away from us, and MIL currently works part time in retail - she agreed to look after DD 1 day a week so we would only have to pay childcare 3 days a week (and would be lovely for DD to spend the day with her grandma!) Her rota is different every week so this would obviously be pending agreement with work.
However, FIL is now insisting that MIL looks after DD full time and quits her current job (so we would be expected to pay roughly £7000-£8000 to cover this). Or nothing, as if she wants to eventually go full time, she won't get another job if she has childcare responsibilities already on one specific day. He has also stated he would expect MIL to look after DD then find work in the evenings/work weekends too.
In his mind, we wouldn't have to pay for childcare while we are on holiday/DD isn't there so would be better off.
AIBU to want to completely keep away from all of this and think FIL is being a massive CF? Financially, it doesn't make any sense for us as with tax free childcare and petrol taken into consideration, it's about equal cost - and at least at nursery we would be guaranteed she would be getting to take part in activities etc. We would also be expected to pay for any classes/groups that MIL would take her to.
We didn't ask MIL to have her full time as we know they can't afford to not work, now we have been put in a very difficult situation and are increasingly under pressure from FIL. FWIW, we would have paid MIL some money for the 1 day she looked after DD and provided everything for her. But it doesn't sit right to me to be paying more per hour to a family member than a qualified childcare provider! It feels as though DD is being used as a money making scheme.
Please tell me I'm not losing my mind and this is odd behaviour from FIL?!?!?