Exasperated by this thread. No-one said no treats. They said noedibletreats. Numerous people have given examples of allergies as an example to no avail. "Oh we'll just give them somethnig different", once again leaving that child to feel left out of what everyone else is getting. Non-edible treats make more sense surely, just need a little more thought
Easter is about Easter Eggs. Some children have lots of Easter eggs, others have none!
If a child has allergies to chocolate then it's up to the child's parents to let school know about the allergy. It doesn't mean that children shouldn't have a traditional Easter treat, from school, because of one childs allergy. Some are unlikely to get an egg at home.
Why should some children get Easter eggs....or alternative treats for Easter... whilst others get nothing at all?
Teachers cannot, and should not be under scrutiny because some cossetted child gets alternative gifts - according to their individual needs, from home, whilst others get nothing at all.
It's a bloody Easter egg! Some children will treasure the egg and be grateful that their teacher provided a treat. Others don't need the teachers gift. They will be swamped with chocolate, or alternative gifts over Easter.
FFS! Every child matters!