To think this wedding dress is a bit... much?

[CrabbityRabbit]

Idly browsing wedding dresses (not planning on getting married anytime soon) and came across this one in Pronovias 2019.

AIBU to think you don't want your actual muff on show on your wedding. I'm no prude but... really?

Anyone else seen some shockers?

BejamNostalgia
Remember that so well. There were lots of raised eyebrows about her ensemble, and the priest who performed the ceremony, trying to balance the naysaying, said in response that she had worn her sincerity.

I imagine that the women who would wear dresses like those wouldn't have any muff as such - they'd be clean-waxed so it would just all be skin.

That one Mary Charteris is wearing though - the shape of the dress makes her look deformed, as though her legs are 2/3 the length they should be.

These must be wedding magazine shots and not real life. You would then work out what to wear underneath?

Agree with everyone else this is just for the fashion show, it will be lined when it goes into production (hopefully). Sex sells and it will get the designer headlines just like most other high end fashion shows. Some of those dresses are beautiful.

You can’t beat a nice knitted wedding dress. Fanjo modesty preserved.

I wanted to wear this fabulous little tulle mini skirt wedding dress when I was getting married in 1991. My mother was horrified but said if I cleared it with the Reverend, she would buy it. He said no. I still feel sad about it.

I like that one, @LellyMcKelly – it's like a nice fancy tampon

I suspect that they’re modelled that way so we can see the lace and embroidery detailing; it would be nigh on impossible to distinguish those on the runway or in photographs if the sheer layer was worn against a slip. I’m sure there are some ladies out there that might be tempted to do without an under layer, though!

If it wasn't see-through it would be beautiful.
Not that I am ever getting married again, like....

i thought white wedding dresses were supposed to be virginal and demure obviously not but i certainly would not want my family and friends to see my lady garden or my boobs

My friend got married in something not that dissimilar but it real life it had a nude lining and really looked lovely, not see through at all. When she sent me photos before the wedding I was gobsmacked if I'm honest. But it really did look fabulous.

I always think these catwalk dresses are funny. Purely because a white wedding dress originally symbolised being a virgin. But when every one can see through it it Kind of takes the tradition away....and would be very cold this time of year

@LellyMcKelly that dress is fantastic! I cant stop scrolling back to it

There surely must be a black version for the groom!

I knew that one would surface, never! I still think it's prob a dress that is supposed to fit a much smaller-boobed girl - you can see the fold-over under her boobs where the material would come up and over a smaller top, and the prongy bits/nipple-covers should be low-shoulder.

Yeah, most of these are not virginal! What's the point of them being white?

LellyMcKelly that dress is AMAZING!!!

How long before a bride walks down the aisle completely naked except for perhaps a little fascinator in the hair? Holding a bunch of flowers in front of her doo-dah.

I expect I'm behind the times and it's already been done at a nudist camp. No, I don't think I want to see the pictures.

You could always go for this look.

Personal fave

Or this

I prefer one with a bit more coverage like this though

These dresses

Well, at least those models seem still have a natural look down there. Yay for them.

You can’t beat a nice knitted wedding dress. Fanjo modesty preserved.

Billbalbaggins is that Victoria Beckham in the audience? She certainly looks bemused!