Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Unqualified teacher salary

67 replies

Heartbrokengirl14 · 12/01/2019 15:04

I posted this is in work but didn’t get any replies. I have been working as a cover supervisor in a secondary school for the last couple of months, first role in a school environment me still learning classroom management ect. After Christmas I was asked to take on teaching as some of the teachers are over their hours. I am only teaching 11 out of 30 periods, the other periods I am either supporting or covering lessons. I am somewhat supported with this but left to my own devices so I am planning my own lessons. At the minute I am with an agency and being paid 70 pound a day but it seems likely that I might be employed by the school directly. Though I am not a full time unqualified teacher I am doing this role along side of my cover role and think if I am offered the job my salary should reflect this. What would be a fair salary that I should expect?

OP posts:
IntentsAndPorpoises · 12/01/2019 15:06

There are no national pay scales so you need to see what it says in the school's pay policy. You could look at the STPCD to see what it suggests for unqualified teacher pay scale.

noblegiraffe · 12/01/2019 15:08

There’s an unqualified teacher pay scale so you could use that. I’d expect to be paid unqualified teacher rate for the lessons you teach, and cover supervisor rate for the ones you just cover. You should get paid PPA of 10% for your teaching hours.

Jackshouse · 12/01/2019 15:08

A newly qualified teacher earns approx £100 a day.

longwayoff · 12/01/2019 15:29

Unqualified teacher? I'm out of date with schools, what on earth is going on? Who employs unqualified teachers and what do you do? Is this another government money saver?

Heartbrokengirl14 · 12/01/2019 15:31

Thank you! I think being paid unqualified teaching pay and then cover pay for the rest of my hours would be fair! I don’t expect it to be that much more then I am bei paid now. I am just cautious of being taken advantage of as I am aware of co workers at the same agency just doing cover with same experience being paid more but I don’t want to seem grabby.

OP posts:
loubluee · 12/01/2019 15:34

Just curious- what are you teaching?

TSSDNCOP · 12/01/2019 15:34

I can tell you there definitely is an unqualified teacher pay scale. Talk to the HR person at your school/Trust, they will be able to give you guidance,

Haggisfish · 12/01/2019 15:34

Local authority schools can only employ teachers with a degree. Academies can employ anybody as a teacher, as an unqualified teacher, and pay them a lot less than a fully trained and qualified teacher.

Pieceofpurplesky · 12/01/2019 15:39

CHeck out the pay scale and don't let them take advantage of you. I take it it's an academy?

RomanyRoots · 12/01/2019 15:40

Gosh, I thought state schools had to employ teachers that were qualified to PgCE standard and a degree in the subject they taught.
I'm glad mine is private.

stopitandtidyupp · 12/01/2019 15:41

According to the tes
www.tes.com/articles/unqualified-teachers-pay-scales

noblegiraffe · 12/01/2019 15:44

I thought state schools had to employ teachers that were qualified to PgCE standard and a degree in the subject they taught.

Gove changed the rules, academies can hire whoever they like.

ohreallyohreallyoh · 12/01/2019 15:46

You need to sort out whether it’s the agency or the school that is paying you because that’s who you need to negotiate with. Agencies are loathe to lose staff who are capable and therefore earn them money without any hassle but the school will have a budget and some of that will go to the agency. If the school want to pay you directly, you need to look at the terms and conditions of your agency contract and the school needs to do the same - most agencies would charge a ‘finders fee’.

Unqualified teacher? I'm out of date with schools, what on earth is going on? Who employs unqualified teachers and what do you do? Is this another government money saver?

Been going on for years. Qualified and experienced teachers can be paid as little as £65 per day to work on daily supply. There is no requirement to have a qualified teacher deliver ‘cover’. Teachers have been shouting for years but unfortunately, as threads on here show, all the public care about are the long holidays and how we don’t have the monopoly on hard work. The consequence is the current mass exodus which is little short of diasastrous but is still not registering as problematic with the electorate.

Ted27 · 12/01/2019 15:50

@RomanyRoots , private schools can also employ who they like, qualified or unqualified

Heartbrokengirl14 · 12/01/2019 15:51

I agree it is problematic! If I had a choice I would rather just cover but teachers at the academy are buried in paperwork and working over their teaching hours.

OP posts:
RomanyRoots · 12/01/2019 15:52

Ted

I know, thank God all ours are qualified, mostly with years of experience.

daisypond · 12/01/2019 15:55

Gosh, I thought state schools had to employ teachers that were qualified to PgCE standard and a degree in the subject they taught.
I'm glad mine is private.

Private school teachers aren't always qualified to PGCE standard. Many don't have any teaching qualifications. A friend of mine was appalled to discover at the expensive boarding school her child was at some teachers had no teaching qualifications.

Riv · 12/01/2019 16:03

Romany roots- private schools have never had to employ qualified teachers and many don’t. They do usually (but not always) employ people to teach who have a degree of some sort.
Academies only have to employ one qualified teacher per school, for example the head teacher, to supervise the work of the adults leading the classes. They often employ more qualified teachers than the required minimum. The adults leading classes do not need any qualifications, but the qualified teacher needs to consider them to be competent.

RomanyRoots · 12/01/2019 16:20

I guess we are lucky they are all qualified teachers and have degrees.
I'm pretty sure they were in the state schools our other dc attended, as they were usually NQT, as cheaper for the schools. This was before Academies though.
We seem to be going backwards.

ilovesooty · 12/01/2019 16:24

I'm sure there are still plenty of parents who neither know nor care that their child's school can put anyone with a pulse in front of classes.

Haggisfish · 12/01/2019 16:27

Private schools are actually worse in some ways. Lots of their teachers have very good university qualifications, but little teaching qualifications. And high academic achieves do not almost ever make the best teachers imo.

LJdorothy · 12/01/2019 16:38

No such thing in Scotland thank god. Surely an unqualified teacher isn't actually a teacher at all? You wouldn't take your child to an unqualified 'doctor' would you?

longwayoff · 12/01/2019 16:48

Outraged, didn't realise Gove's grubby mitts had done this to the semi privatised state sector although I knew about the longstanding lower standards for private schoo!s. Don't be offended OP, I'm not traducing the quality of your work but the relentless downgrading and defunding of our established institutions by this parsimonious and contemptuous government.

howrudeforme · 12/01/2019 16:49

Ohreally

Had no idea re the ratios of qualified teachers to non qualified permitted.

I did speak to a woman who was a maths teacher at a tech college who was then employed as a French teacher in a secondary school - she basically learned the language alongside the kids. 🤔

daisypond · 12/01/2019 16:51

A friend of mine who is both a teacher and head of department at a well-regarded and well-known private school doesn't even have a degree, let alone teaching qualifications - but she knows her stuff.

Swipe left for the next trending thread