My own position is that Trump first came to my attention in about 1980, when I regarded him as a seedy and probably dishonest real estate broker of some sort with dubious connections. I also noticed that he treated his wife disgustingly, and that he was well-hated for his unpleasant behaviour in Scotland. Oh, and that he was a consummate vulgarian whom I was glad I was not likely to have to meet.
Since he became president of the United States of America, he has done absolutely nothing to alter my existing opinion of him, and plenty to reinforce it; he also seems to be in the not-quite-early stages of some sort of mental disintegration or senility, unable to construct a complete sentence without fubbling it when he is talking and completely unable to distinguish fact from fiction in either his speech or his writing.
I get what amusement I can before this loonie blows up the planet as revenge because it doesn't love him the way he thinks that it ought to, and because his lies and illegalities are catching up with him and he may get punished for them by pointing my finger at him and saying "Look at the silly man." Unlike him, I can tell fact from fiction, and I can also tell when someone says one thing one day, its diametric and incompatible opposite the next, then goes back to the first again the day after that, and none of it has any factual basis. See his "the people who are getting no money because I have shut down the government support me /they are mostly democrats/they almost all support me" of recent days. He is on film and on tweet saying these things, sequentially; how is that altered by the media?
(Does this board have a dnftt policy at all?)