So, in relation to Christmas car park twattery, I've been considering posting this, and since this thread has presented itself, (YANBU OP, it's maddening), what do the MN jury think of this?
We were in a very busy car park (moi, DH, 2 DCs, one still in a five point harness that she can't do up herself so I need to be able to wedge my ample buttocks in the door to do her up).
A P&C space was coming free at the end of a row, so we drew up alongside and indicated (plenty room to get past us - that's not the point). People pulled out a couple of seconds after we pull up, DH went into reverse and started moving to notice that someone is driving into the space, forward, at a diagonal. DH slammed on the brakes so as not to hit her. I jumped out and said, "This is a P&C space, and we have children." To which she said "I have a blue badge. That trumps P&C!". The row opposite us was for disabled drivers, and there were cars pulling out so she could have used one of those. I decided it was Christmas, and didn't want the argument, so got back in and within a few minutes we managed to get a non P&C space, and on the way home, I just about managed to get DD2 into the car without denting the car next to me.
I recognise that IAMBU as this description would be easier with a diagram, but the punchline is should she have been able to nick our space? Do P&C spaces default to disabled ones? Also, I recognise that disabled spaces are a legal right, whereas P&C spots aren't, and would never, ever, park in a disabled spot, but if it's NOT a disabled spot, do blue badges get priority?
Also, her blue badge wasn't on display when she was parking, but I checked, and it was there when she was parked.
I felt bloody irritated somewhat aggrieved for about five minutes when it happened, was I unreasonable to feel that?