Sorry but I agree with user (Unless exceptional circumstances eg where like in beccas Drs case the dr was clearly ill & recovering from a trauma) we just cannot afford to be very expensively training Drs, especially GP's, if they're not intending to work full time at least for say 10 years post qualification.
It's bound to be skewing recruitment planning too. If those going into GP were honest saying they intend to work part time BEFORE they start training then surely that means those planning recruitment and deciding how many to accept for training can try and increase the number of people trained, in order to try to provide enough coverage. Although that wouldn't completely solve the issue.
Maybe
Allow more applicants to undertake GP training to allow for the fact many want to work part time.
Adjust GP salaries so that more/enough can be trained/hired.
Allow patients to self refer where possible so GP appointments purely to obtain a referral aren't necessary.
Train & Hire more nurse practitioners and educate the public as to the fact these nurses can provide certain services they might think are ones only the GP can provide. Ours is excellent, but there's only one of her, whereas we always seem to have 2-3 locums in the surgery at any one time which must be more expensive than hiring another or even 2 full time np's. The locums are often taking appointments that could be handled by np's.
Personally I also think better training of GP's so they listen & don't fob off particularly women with long term issues, referring them to specialists when it's clear the GP either doesn't know what's wrong or their treatments haven't worked, would reduce how many GP appointments are needed.
It really must be a false economy only treating the symptoms which too often is what's happening. When identifying the cause and thus being able to provide the correct treatment would not only be better for the patient but save money long term.