"I'm sorry but poverty isn't top of my list" wow! Somehow I don't believe the apology! I guess at least it's honest!
Is that because you think it doesn't and never will affect you? (If so you could be in for a rude awakening at some point in your life! You never know what's around the corner).
Do you think it doesn't affect you now indirectly? Because more poverty means more strain on nhs, social services, emergency services, schools, more crime etc etc you don't even care about any of that? Your community WILL include people in poverty.
"They could get a job if they tried hard enough" 🙄 where I live there's an average of 180 people applying for each job. Think I mentioned this before, but even according to govts own figs there's 3.5 times more jobseekers (so that fig doesn't include anyone not on jsa, so doesn't inc sahm looking to get back into the workplace either supported by partners/husbands or on income support rather than jsa, doesn't inc people on ESA who are gradually becoming well enough to work and wanting to ease back into work, adult children living at home supported by parents...) than there are jobs available (and that's ALL jobs not just full time but even 4 hour a week 'Saturday' jobs).
"As would cleaning, painting, baking child minding"
ALL of these require an initial outlay for work materials, advertising, insurance, possibly hygiene certification - if someone has NO INCOME where is that supposed to come from? Re ironing - if they haven't even the money to heat food where is the money to power the iron coming from?
Child minding - which I and many mners have done - you are legally required to have X sq ft of space per child, everything has to be baby/childproofed, you have to have a disclosure (police background) check (crb in England?), you have to have food hygiene, health & safety and first aid qualifications AS A MINIMUM, some councils also require an early years education qualification, you have to provide toys, books and equipment which must meet certain standards and be appropriate to the age and background of the child/ren you're minding, you have to have public liability insurance, there's registration fees... And if someone is living in ONE ROOM there's no way they could do this safely or legally! And that's just based on how it was when I did it almost 20 years ago, I understand there are more requirements/legislation now?
If you're suggesting people on benefits do these for "extra money" that would be benefit fraud which is illegal and could well lead to them having NO INCOME for years!
Clearly there's also people posting with NO experience whatsoever of the benefits system.
Under the 'old' system that's being phased out as soon as you took on ANY work you were legally bound to declare it. IMMEDIATELY upon declaring what usually happens/happened is all benefits were 'suspended' until they were satisfied what you were telling them was true. Even if you weren't earning enough to make you ineligible for those benefits. SOME of those benefits when reinstated would be backdated, but not all, and even so what are people supposed to live on in the time where the benefits are suspended but they've not yet had a payday? Conversely if you somehow manage to find work but it's temporary or the business goes bust (which as we've seen in recent years can happen even to the biggest high street names) it takes several weeks for benefits to be reinstated - sometimes months. That's one reason why under that system people were so reluctant to take temporary jobs, or jobs with new businesses that hadn't yet established themselves.
Under the 'new' UC system these issues were SUPPOSED to be eradicated - instead they're being compounded by others. Eg on UC system there's little direct contact with dwp, it's mainly done online (that rather stuffs those of you claiming tech is a luxury doesn't it? Especially when library cuts are also considered) on a 'journal' where in theory a claimant stays in touch with their adviser with a sort of private messaging system. Except advisers aren't checking people's journals regularly, aren't sending messages accurately (sometimes resulting in claimants missing essential appointments and getting sanctioned. They're then trying to deny stating wrong day/time. It's so bad agencies like cab are now advising claimants to screenshot these messages), the phone lines for claimants were premium rate numbers, that's recently been changed but it takes little imagination how that could be problematic! Especially when it can take up to 3 hours to get answered! UC was SUPPOSED to be able to cope with varying hours worked, temp contracts, people working more than one job - it isn't! Even in a 'normal' job with a monthly salary in months where you get 2 payments falling within the UC 'month' that means claimants getting NOTHING even though they are eligible. There's copious miscalculations occurring, the supposed transfer protection isn't happening as it should - it's a fucking farce!
As for 'you could get a little extra money by...' Under UC for each £1 you earn you lose 63p UC so you're actually only earning 37p per £1 your customer pays you!
But yea, blame the people struggling under these conditions not the people creating them who are NOT missing out on ANYTHING!
Some people really do live in cloud cuckoo land!
That THIS is happening in a country where there's MORE than enough money to go around is utterly shameful!
www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/dec/20/working-homeless-britain-economy-minimum-wage-zero-hours