I’ve been driving for a long time. I took my test at 17. In that time I estimate I’ve spent upwards of 40k on cars, 10k on insurance, £3k on MOT’s and services, £2k on tax plus I have no idea how much on repairs, new tyres, petrol etc. Then there was the cost of driving lessons, the theory test, the actual driving test. It adds up to a significant amount.
So AIBU to think that people who choose not to learn to drive (obviously unless of medical conditions etc) should not just assume a driver will give them a lift somewhere unless they are offered?
I work shifts. Many of my colleagues don’t drive so have to get the bus or a taxi. I’ve lost count of how many of them have just assumed I’ll give them a lift home to save them using public transport. If I’ve refused (politely, I might add) they always say they’ll give me what they would have paid in bus/taxi fare. Well that’s all very well but I’m neither a bus nor a taxi. I have given lifts on occasion, and made it clear that it’s not a regular thing, to people where I won’t have to go out of my way to drop off. Certain colleagues, who lives 4-5 miles in the opposite direction, have just assumed therefore that I’ll also take them home and have taken offence when I’ve refused to add an extra 8-10 miles a day onto my journey, especially when this can take an extra half an hour during rush hour. I am always polite and explain my reasons, and don’t need advice on how to say no to them because I’m perfectly able to refuse, but I just can’t believe the cheek of some people. One of them asked me to drive him home in the snow because he ‘didn’t fancy’ walking to the bus stop when my car was parked nearby. He lives up a hill that is well known for being a hazard in bad weather so I didn’t particularly fancy someone running into me and damaging my car/injuring me when it wasn’t even on my route home.
I’m always the first to offer if someone is in desperate need and I would never see someone struggle but it seems that everyone assumes a driver is a taxi!
So AIBU?