Meghan's dress was lovely but lumpy looking,/ill fitting bra look

[Bahhhhhumbug]

Anyone else notice how lumpy it looked at front like when you wear a bra that's two small and you have two cleavages lt spoiled it for me tbh though l think she looked stunning. I thought it might just be the light as it is quite shimmery but have noticed it in several shots /light now. A wardrobe malfunction?

I'm sorry but she looked incredible.

Quadruple boobs

@LetsGoBitches - I'm not sure your GP (or you) understand what perimenopause is to be honest!

I thought she looked amazing, the dress was simple and classy and she looked beautiful

Got to be careful here, got threatened with a ban last week for suggesting an obvious journalist’s post was an obvious journalist’s post. So, of course, I thought the dress was just wondrous (gush). Fuck me, might as well be on NM

we were laughing at Diana's dress at the time, it featured on 'not the nine o cloc k news' for those old enough to remember.

there must be an mn vision thing. only i can see that kate's ghastly dress made it look like her bra was showing, yet meghan's elegant smooth one is appare ntl y lumpy.

excuse spaces,.mn cant code and dont listen.

So from LetsGoBitches:

Looking at her knuckles, they remind me of bulimic’s knuckles I have observed before.

And also from LetsGoBitches:

Your anecdotal story isn’t science, just what happened to you. You cannot prove or disprove a theory on your own personal story..

Right...

No point feeding the hairy handed. Ignore them and they'll either give up, or end up getting themselves banned.

Tiara stunning. Veil stunning. Dress not so stunning.

Yes, agree with this. The dress didn't do much for me, I though Kate's was more imaginative and flattering.

The tiara/veil on the other hand was a complete knockout.

Very simple but classy looking. Can't think why on earth it cost £100000 though .
I though her demure look was quite nice. I bet she'll go for full glitz and sparkle tonight.

I notice that Harry rubbed something off her knuckle when they held hands, she probably just grazed it. She was so calm and relaxed!! Cool.

I thought it was beautiful. It seems quite a stiff, formal fabric so isn’t going to drape and be close fitting.

I thought it was perfect. Formal enough for a Royal Wedding without trying to upstage Kate. Very old-Hollywood elegant, an Audrey Hepburn feel with Givenchy. It wasn’t too try hard, I loved it.

She looked so beautiful.

Utter crap. She looked sublime.

I thought Harry just rubbed her hand affectionately.

I liked the dress but agree it did look a bit roomy around the bodice.

“thought the dress was gorgeous. I think people are now so conditioned by the Kardashian “show every millimetre of your figure” trend that they forget what proper couture clothes used to look like. A number of commentators made the link between Givenchy and Hepburn, and Meghan’s dress certainly had that old-school elegance which is all but lost now. Simple, clean lines, beautifully unfussy, and such a delicate veil”

I totally agree too. Meghan is a wonderfully vibrant beautiful woman, she can spring off a brilliantly structured simple canvas.

'What a lot of miserable folk on here. She looked lovely. Kate looked lovely. The bridesmaids and page boys were lovely. The sun shone. It was all lovely.'
THIS

I thought she looked elegant and beautiful. The whole wedding was perfect.

To those who claim they could see her nipples/aureolas/four boobs.....
you gotta go to specsavers

or get therapy for your jealousy

I'm as republican as they get...

It was lovely. All of it.

I wish them a long and happy marriage.

I thought that initially, but then felt ashamed of myself for being so critical of something so insignificant.

She's been through a lot in the last week or so. The dress was understated and her natural beauty shone. I wasn't at all bothered about the wedding before today but for anyone to have that amount of shit, that amount of pressure, I think she (and her mum) did brilliantly.

The style was nice,classic , It was just pity it didn't fit!
Surprising to go for full arms in mid may iI wonder if she needed her arms to be covered? Bare arms do not look very atractive on very thin women of her age, or maybe scars she wants to hide.Can't see any recent bare-arm pics of her on the internet

Her dress suited her. She's obviously lost weight.

I was disappointed in the Archbishop's dress as well. I'm sure it's the same one he wore for William and Kate's wedding

iI wonder if she needed her arms to be covered?

FFS.

second dress is also lovely

@Ruffian