Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think Poundland ad is not “genius” and is actually a bit I appropriate?

773 replies

speakerwoofers · 21/12/2017 15:25

Most comments on Facebook are proclaiming it “genius.” I don’t think a sexual innuendo is that genius TBF.

Plus why is it a woman lying on her back with a t shirt saying “power” and a man standing over her dominating her. They could have at least chosen another sexual innuendo.

Also difficult to explain to kids.

Or have I got the wrong end of the stick?

To think Poundland ad is not “genius” and is actually a bit I appropriate?
OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
NotAgainYoda · 21/12/2017 19:19

Lyyod

Are you thick? You sound a bit thick.

NotAgainYoda · 21/12/2017 19:21

To rephrase, less rudely:

Someone chose those doll and chose to pose them in that way. A way that is representative of something else. Geddit?

SmileChuck · 21/12/2017 19:27

To be clear, I will discuss apparent consent or otherwise in posed doll adverts as long as consent or otherwise is an issue in real life.

Which it is.

OhYouBadBadKitten · 21/12/2017 19:28

At best, it is deeply unpleasant, at worst it perpetuates the idea of abuse being not just acceptable, but amusing.

ugh.

VladmirsPoutine · 21/12/2017 19:28

I find the ad juvenile, misogynist and cheap (in style, I don't know how much it cost). But I'm not going to ascribe human conditions to inanimate objects. Dolls cannot consent - I know that makes me thick - clearly the image shows the barbie refusing but the elf continuing nonetheless to dangle a teabag over her face. The barbie clearly didn't consent to having a teabag dangled over her face. I must be so obtuse to have not realised that. Perhaps I'm the most obtuse feminist on Mumsnet.

BertrandRussell · 21/12/2017 19:29

I think we're going to have to go back to first principles here. Do you understand the concept of images? That's a start. Do you know that images represent things? The thoughts in people's heads, for example? How certain groups are perceived?

CherryChasingDotMuncher · 21/12/2017 19:30

Oh look, dolls mocking of the objectification of women HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Hilarious. Hmm
I imagine the kind of people who find this funny probably go and see Roy Chubby Brown live

BarbarianMum · 21/12/2017 19:31

But if you can't ascribe human conditions to inanimate objects Vladimir then it can't be misogynistic either. Either you're open to bits of plastic representing a man and woman or you're not.

AccidentallyRunToWindsor · 21/12/2017 19:32

They probably watch Jim Davidson DVD's too @CherryChasingDotMuncher

PumpkinSquash · 21/12/2017 19:34

Its a good job children don't have access to the internet when it actively pushes sexist images all the time isn't it?

Kids shouldn't be on social media anyway. Ones in high school who are more likely to be on Twitter/FB will have heard it all at school anyway. Unfortunately.

MiaowTheCat · 21/12/2017 19:37

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

DeleteOrDecay · 21/12/2017 19:38

Facebook is full of people saying that 'itz just a bit of fun innit

Probably the same people who thought the couples wedding photos that involved the bride pretending to give the groom oral in front of a picturesque landscape was the height of hilarityHmm

I don't really care if people think I'm a prude for not liking this advert. I'm over it at this point.

LloydSpinjago · 21/12/2017 19:39

Lyyod

Are you thick? You sound a bit thick

As thick as not being able to spell Lloyd? Smile

PumpkinSquash · 21/12/2017 19:40

Probably the same people who thought the couples wedding photos that involved the bride pretending to give the groom oral in front of a picturesque landscape was the height of hilarity

Nope, that was totally disgusting and not acceptable at a family wedding and at a religious type ceremony too.
So, try again.

DeleteOrDecay · 21/12/2017 19:41

Are you one of the people on Facebook pp was referring to then pumpkin?

NotAgainYoda · 21/12/2017 19:41
Smile

You got me. My fingers are literally thick

VladmirsPoutine · 21/12/2017 19:42

You're entitled to your opinion, I'm not going to patronise you or tell you you're thick. Oddly enough I was having a discussion with someone I assumed to be a man (male name and avatar) underneath the original picture on Twitter and he also called me thick for disagreeing with him that it's just a bit of a laugh and I should untwist my knickers. Hey ho.

stitchglitched · 21/12/2017 19:45

This is grim. Also grim is Poundland altering the advert so they don't offend a tea brand but seemingly don't give much of a fuck about offending women.

DeleteOrDecay · 21/12/2017 19:50

Yep. It's fine to degrade women in this way but god forbid they upset a major tea brand. Money talks I guess.

WaitrosePigeon · 21/12/2017 19:52

Absolutely grim. Any reason why it wasn’t a man lying on the floor?

PumpkinSquash · 21/12/2017 19:53

Are you one of the people on Facebook pp was referring to then pumpkin

No,I am finding the tweets and all the reaction funny on Twitter though.

BarbarianMum · 21/12/2017 19:54

Silly Waitrose What would be funny about that?

WaitrosePigeon · 21/12/2017 19:57

Exactly. I don’t often get pissed off by stuff like this, I like a laugh but what the fuck is this. Seriously. What is it saying? I’m confused.

All I see is an elf teabagging a barbie?

OhYouBadBadKitten · 21/12/2017 19:59

The only positive that has come from this is that I've discovered how easy it is to complain to the advertising standards agency.

MinorRSole · 21/12/2017 19:59

Ffs. How pathetic, think I'll avoid the store in future. No great loss as it's full of cheap shit and I can get my cleaning stuff in home bargains

Clearly they are idiots

Swipe left for the next trending thread