Well, believe it or not, I was quite genuine in wondering what underlies the addiction to proclaim a victimised, silenced status - when the fact you can have a conversation with people on MN suggests that really isn't the case.
And I'm interested in that. I don't quite understand the dynamics of it.
I also don't get the whole 'arrogance' thing. I think it seems to be a projection, something that is read into a situation, rather than something based in intent.
I'm finding the animosity towards the statistics interesting, too. I think some posters are misreading noble's comments in an odd way. She very clearly unhitched intelligence and academic achievement - but that seems to have been ignored.
A lot of my more right-wing acquaintance have socially liberal views but right-wing economic views. They're very confident and don't have the sense of fragility I'm picking up here. They go skiing and don't really worry about whether they should or shouldn't voice their opinions. They'll happily explain to anyone why pensions, state education and the NHS should be done away with, and they'll defend their opinions robustly.
So I'm genuinely interested why there is this thing repeated by MN r-wingers that they are oppressed by a Leftie majority. We have a Conservative government. What Leftie majority is this that is silencing people? Where?
MN is pretty mixed these days - and as I keep saying, you can write left or right wing comments (and many shades in between) - though not without an expectation of challenge. And that is the same for any opinion, political or otherwise. So I don't think it's the case that lefties on MN silence the right.
And I can understand that you might have friends of an alternative political persuasion on MN and might want to reign in what you say for fear of rupturing the on-line friendship. But I don't think that's what the posters talking here have in mind.
And the silencing isn't going on in the real world, either (unless you have truly atrocious views that cross legal lines).
So where is this silencing? Why the need to cling to this idea?
I'm honestly baffled.