I've just had to check the date. This is 2017 right? Not 1950.
This stupid stupid question seems to pop up on MN with as much regularity as P&C parking.
I made the decision to keep my own name when I got married back in the early 80s. When DC1 was on the way I made some enquiries about surnames and the information out there at the time - pre internet - was that you could give your child any surname you liked BUT for a married couple if you disagreed then the father's wishes would take precedence. Single women could do just as they pleased.
I think younger women on MN have either forgotten or just don't know how recent female freedoms are. Back just before I got married, despite being over 18 and in full time employment I had to have my father's permission for a bank loan (the bank said so, not my df).
So not wanting to lose my name after all that DH took out a deed poll to change his name to Myname-Hisname. The solicitor insisted on interviewing him alone in case I was coercing him
. The deed poll says "I take for myself, my wife and future issue..". I signed nothing, so as far as I'm concerned my legal name is the one I acquired at birth, but that's another story.
The children were all registered as Myname-Hisname (but on the Registrars list they appear twice; once as their proper name and once under just their father's
). Over the years DH has dropped his original name and just uses mine. One DC uses just DH's, 2 use just mine, one uses both. He got married and my DIL took his whole name (then decided she didn't like my family and dropped mine). DS says his DC will have both names.
If and when the others get to that point they have a choice, just as I did. I'd be a bit sad if they dropped my name, but unlike my interfering MIL I won't be making it all about me. They will each get to choose what they want to do at the time, and I will address them by that choice and not impose my wishes on them.