Anatidae "Ahhh John thaw... can I admit to a tiny tiny morse crush? He was fabulous .
I probably didn't get your point uncle jamie - apologies if I misunderstood- I assumed you'd meant he was posh to begin with rather than how well he inhabited the part.
I will be very interested to see who they cast. My money is on tom hiddleston, although I wouldn't cast him per se. I know fassbender is in the running too and I think he's got that icy posh thing going on but he's still not quite bond for me. Both have the feline grace, not sure either has the slightly unique edge that's needed.
Inpersonally think it'd be good to see someone completely new make the part his own. I wasn't sure about Daniel Craig either - not my type, but I think overall he was an ok bond, perhaps because of the tone change in the films."
No worries at all, I'm not sure I explained myself very well to be fair. ☺️
I agree re Craig; this isn't a popular opinion but IMO he was best in Casino Royale, which is the most classic and Fleming-esque Bond film of the modern era. Everything comes together in that, from the story to the Directing and score. When Eon changed to Sam Mendes and he brought in Thomas Newman to compose, they lost that inherent 007 quality.
Anyway, I digress. The point about Connery being "too emotional" is interesting, because in the book of Casino Royale, and of course OHMSS, Bond was emotional. Moore suited the era and the silliness of the films in the 70s but I don't think he was a good enough actor to have suited the earlier films.
Interestingly, while we've all been arguing discussing Bond, the OP seems to have left the thread. Do you think we've de-railed it? 