@PoppyPopcorn
It is not discriminatory to say that some names are more popular with people who live in poorer areas and have lower levels of education. It's fact.
This x 1000. ^
And if you're recruiting someone to represent your company you have to consider their name. I'd rather have Sarah, Fiona or Amelia on the reception desk than Destyny-Blu, Chardonnay or Princess-Pinky.
PMSL, Destyny-Blu!!! 😂
As has been said, people will judge people based on their Christian names. As bad as it is, it's what people do.
Same with where they come from. My niece was picked for a part time job working at a major law firm for her uni placement. My sister lives in a rural village in Cambridgeshire, and my niece's name is Elizabeth.
She was told a week or so in, that several other people applied, but she was picked over them because of her name and where she was from. Eg, Elizabeth who lived in a cottage in an upper-middle class village in Cambridgeshire, was a preferred option to Chardonnay or Britneigh-Leigh who lived in a flat in the middle of Wolverhampton.
Employers, and, as someone said on the previous page also universities, will judge people on their Christian name.
I wonder if anyone knows a Chelseigh or a Tyler or a Britnee or a Tilly-Mae who goes to Kings College London, or Cambridge, or Oxford? I bet no-one does. (Although I am sure a few people on mumsnet will claim to know a few!)
I just really wish people will think it through before they name their child, and realise that they have it for life. AND, it will affect them for life.
When teachers say they suspect that kids with certain names are going to be the troublesome and disruptive ones, (and they usually are,) they are not being 'prejudiced,' they are telling it like it is.
I would class Cameron as a boy's name by the way, but a girl can pull it off. Girls can pull off traditional boy's names much better than boys call pull off traditional girls names!!! Imagine a boy called Helen Or Emily? Or Destynee-Blue or Ashleeeighhhe-Mae! 😄