"It's sad very sad, but to blame the benefit system is ridiculous. There are many things in life that are extremely stressful but avoiding stress only make things worse in the long term, teaching resiliency and how to cope with stressful events, even with mental health issues, is the best way to make sure sufferers don't end up taking drastic actions."
This is a perfect example of one of the attitudes that I'm talking about - an attitude that is gathering popularity.
Yes, for example lets 'teach resilience' to people suffering from severe mental illness, who may be manic or paranoid or unable to get out of bed.
By 'teaching resilience' what you are really preaching is personal responsibility. Personal responsibility is genuinely important, of course - but there are huge swathes of people who cannot look after themselves without ongoing help.
There are people who cannot work, or who cannot safely work enough hours to meet their financial needs.
There are people who could work if their environment was adjusted, but employers won't do that or won't take the risk of hiring you.
I am saddened because I don't believe you know what you are truly saying by this. You truly believe it's as simple as being resilient, and if you are things will generally go ok in life, apart from a few ups and downs, along with the unavoidable experiences of being human such as some illness and bereavement, etc.
When you say that, you infer the inverse of that - that the people who can't cope, can't manage and end up dead, are somehow responsible by not being resilient enough to cope.
There are actual vulnerable people trapped in situations with no way out, and a government who strives to make it harder to access a basic standard of living with a safe place to live and food to eat.