Said by colleague in a very "how could anyone with a moral bone in their body rent from such evil" tone when I mentioned that DS' landlady (non resident) used to ride to hounds (so this would have been pre-2004 law and he has been her tenant for only 5 years so it makes not a jot of difference now).
Bloody ridic or what? Decent rental property is like gold dust where he lives and she is in fact a very good landlady as I was relating (hunting past came up relating to an unrelated story). Who gives a stuff what she did 13 years ago - not that I would do it myself?