We have been at a music festival this weekend. It started Friday. It's a cashless festival where you charge up your wristband with cash/bank card and literally everything you buy comes off the band.
Our eldest is 12 and allowed a fair bit of freedom (family friendly festival and some of our friends were there - the older kids like to go off together etc) so we agreed he could have his own funds. This was to cover evening meal from the foodstalls, fairground rides, ice creams, drinks in the arena and any other bits he wanted to buy on a whim. (We did a cooked breakfast and picnic lunch at the campsite.)
Any unspent credit on wristbands can be reclaimed to your bank account afterwards. Last year he had none left!
The first day we agreed to give him £40, then top up £20 Saturday and £20 Sunday to make sure he didn't blow it all in one go! This worked well the previous year when he tended to be a bit profligate. Having thought about it he has got a lot better at saving recently, as he's developed an expensive trainer habit!
So Friday went to plan. Saturday by the afternoon he relayed to me that he still had £27 left. Unfortunately by then our youngest (3) had become quite poorly. Went to see the medics who suspected possible tonsilitis but advised giving her calpol to see if she rallied. I gave son £20 top up as agreed (a bit distracted at this point) but within an hour 3 year old had gone downhill so decided to go home with her. We all left. Husband decided to go back to festival yesterday for last day. Son decided not to go as it was bucketing with rain.
Son now asserts that it is fair just and reasonable that all the reclaimed cash from his wristband should be his. We had never actually discussed this. He also revealed that he had always assumed that to be the case and that he had deliberately underspent on Friday for this reason (saving for new must have item).
So husband thinks HIBU and I should reclaim/keep all the money. It's my call though as it came from my "fun money" funds.
I think he shouldn't be punished for saving/budgeting though I also think he is a bit cheeky and presumptuous when the money was given for a specific purpose. (I was a bit like that myself as a child however so I can relate).
I am considering letting him keep the £27 from the first day but reclaiming the £20 from the second day for myself. This is not least because when we arrived home on Saturday we had a McDonald's and I also took the kids out for a tonsilitis-friendly ice cream sundae yesterday as a treat - all paid for by me so the Saturday top up up should be null and void.
Son says IABU as the money was not given with conditions.
So who is right? Me, H or son?