Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To give up work and become a SAHM?

414 replies

YouAreMySunshine9 · 28/07/2017 10:26

This is more of a 'what would you do' but I suppose I am posting here for trafficking Blush Have name changed as the figures I give will out me.

First DC is due soonish and I'm thinking, after maternity leave, that I should give up my job because financially, it's not worth it and I want to SAH with DC as it'll have more benefits to it?

Myself and DH are both low earners. I earn just under £20K, he earns £21K.

We aren't entitled to anything with us both working, but, somehow top ups would make us better off if one of us didn't work? Hmm

I'm quite a poorly person, I have an autoimmunity disease so I have a feeling working just to pay childcare (if it even ends up covering that?) and missing out in DC's first for it will send me into despair.

My concern is... The whole career break thing. I would go back to work when DC is a few/3 years old but I'm not sure how it'd impact my job prospects. I work as a Medical Secretary in the NHS.

I would say work part time, but I'm not sure we'd get any help there either and it's a lot of huge effort just to fork out to pay for childcare.

What would you do?

I'm really worried Sad

OP posts:
MoreProseccoNow · 01/08/2017 22:06

Another reason women become SAMH and/or reduce their working hours is the gender pay gap. Women are generally paid less than men, often for the same job.

So when it comes to balancing children & work, it's the lower earner who usually drops hours/stops work.

Perhaps with equal pay, men would be more likely to reduce their hours & share home duties more equally.

marleyandpea · 01/08/2017 22:14

I have nothing against stay at home mums at all, in fact I'm not fussed either way, but only if you can afford it. Sadly you can't... that's the top and bottom of it really isn't it?

Justnowthisone · 01/08/2017 22:20

when the patriarchal society we live in is the reason so many women choose to work and use childcare.

I see. It's the women choosing to work and the women choosing to use childcare in that sentence of yours. And you speak of patriarchy.

gillybeanz · 01/08/2017 22:52

When I am talking about equality, yes, I do consider women first Confused don't you.
Women's choices need to be equal to mans and that includes the right to be a sahm.
Of course i'd talk about the patriarchal society that condones inequality.
The same society that plays working and sahm's off against each other.
It doesn't happen to men, their work/home choices aren't commented on, hardly.

Nightshirt · 02/08/2017 00:55

So agree @laurieMarlow

Lucysky2017 · 02/08/2017 08:16

Although it can be the devil's bargain to stay home - appearing so lovely and attractive but when you are cut off without a penny and your children have nothing because you decided to trust and live off a men despite half of marriages failing rather than investing in a career you realise that seductive staying at home state was really just a con. If staying home were that great more men would do it.

MissAlabamaWhitman · 02/08/2017 15:10

If society valued the role of stay at home parents, more men would do it.

Men aren't the arbiters of that which is, or is not 'great'.

gillybeanz · 03/08/2017 13:53

Perhaps not giving the choice of paternity leave, just one year of 6 months each, then men and employers would have to see the benefit.
Women would choose a man who would be happy to take up their 6 months leave and discuss it before planning children.

TheNightmanCometh · 03/08/2017 14:07

That would fuck over those of us who needed more than 6 months for medical reasons very effectively. It's not especially unusual to have to stop work and go on maternity leave at 28 weeks. Potentially leaving a woman with a whole 10 weeks after the birth. I appreciate some of us can work until we're drowning then go back the next day, but lots of us can't.

gillybeanz · 03/08/2017 14:22

Those who needed longer could have sick pay rather than mat leave.
Women would make sure they had dc with the type of man they wanted.
Men would be expected to take the leave by employer, partner and then society in general.

TheNightmanCometh · 03/08/2017 14:39

Because of course, there couldn't possibly be a middle ground between not qualifying for sick pay and not feeling well enough to go back. This is the problem with use it or lose it for dads, far too many people want to take it out of the mothers allowance instead of adding to it.

We both work part time and share childcare, incidentally.

TheNightmanCometh · 03/08/2017 14:41

Also worth pointing out that SSP is about £50 a week less than SMP/SPP. With one on SSP and one on SSP, we'd not have had enough to live on, and were ineligible for tax credits as our income was usually over the threshold.

gillybeanz · 03/08/2017 14:44

Was just a thought Grin I remember when mat leave was only 6 months and men didn't get anything, except maybe 2 weeks.

TheNightmanCometh · 03/08/2017 14:55

Used to be even less, but women were less likely to go back to work in those days.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.