Dangerous times.
Thanks for that link, lionheart. It reminded me of when I worked for the UK government who brought in people from industry to run the organisation because 'the private sector is better'. The new CEO engaged McKinsey to redesign the org structure and his pet consultants to work on development. Anyone with existing skills was part of the problem and the deep expertise that had been built up over many decades was openly disregarded. He brought in deputies who he had worked with before because he could communicate with them, but this widened the gap between the CEO and the people. The CEO didn't understand why staff didn't react in the same way as in his former company, and the organisation didn't get what they did, the value they brought, and the principles of public service. It's always a complex situation even taking Trump out of the equation.
It's one of the reasons why I was interested in Trump's presidency initially. People expected him to behave like Presidents/politicians usually do just like my colleagues expected the new CEO to react like a career permanent secretary. Even without a President who is a narcissist, sociopathic, possibly early Alzheimer's, BPD
, it's a tough act and a long term period of adjustment. The CEO didn't last very long but the damage he inflicted affected the organisation for years afterwards.