Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

To prevent DS channeling Richard III?

94 replies

CecilyNeville · 21/06/2017 14:30

DS is 7. DS likes having longish hair. I like DS having longish hair. However he consented to me cutting his fringe a bit the other day, and now he looks like Richard III as played by Laurence Olivier.

He says he likes the rest of his hair as it is, and doesn't want to cut the length further. Is there anything I can do to kindly, fairly resolve this!? I don't want him to feel coerced, but it really really isn't a good look. We are not Plantagenets.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
TheWhiteRoseOfYork · 22/06/2017 14:02

Joffrey- sorry that came out wrong. I don't mean I would not be your friend, I mean I am not the friend you are talking about.

Mittens1969 · 22/06/2017 14:03

My DDs have been known to cut each other's hair, a couple of times. So embarrassing! DD2's best friend's mum is a hairdresser and cuts their hair so I think they fancy themselves as hairdressers.
I suppose at least they didn't look like Queen Victoria lol. :)

QueenofallIsee · 22/06/2017 17:33

I love this thread - DS2 was convinced for a while he looked 'surfer' and cool but I used to call him Little Lord Fauntleroy.

I miss it a bit now that my 3 boys look like the Peaky Blinders (we are yam though, not brum just to be clear)

SurelyYoureJokingMrFeynman · 22/06/2017 17:50

Deformed haircuts seem to be a trait of Dukes of Gloucester.

To prevent DS channeling Richard III?
Lweji · 22/06/2017 17:56

Sorry to divert from the Plantagenet theme.

There's an 80s revival. He needs a mullet. And he'll set the trend among the 7 year old age group.

ifigoup · 22/06/2017 18:01

This is the best thread I have read on here in many a month.

(I am a genuine Plantaganet!)

liz70 · 22/06/2017 18:52

"what happened to the boys?"

Henry Tiddler killed them.

SwearySwearyQuiteContrary · 22/06/2017 19:00

Tell us more, ifi!

RustyBear · 22/06/2017 19:07

Best example ever of 'I've namechanged for this thread' Grin

SleepOhHowIMissYou
"[Henry VII] took the crown off him on the battlefield and then married his poor sister to legitimise their children's birthright.” Elizabeth of York was Richard's niece, not his sister.

Toadinthehole · 23/06/2017 02:49

HH?

1066 and All That is funnier and more accurate.

CecilyNeville · 04/07/2017 18:43

DS allowed me to cut his hair yesterday. Now he is sporting the 'Grayson Perry' style (as himself, not as Claire).

So that's ... an improvement...

OP posts:
EarlessToothlessVagabond · 04/07/2017 20:37

From Richard III to Grayson Perry. I love your ds. And you.

BagelGoesWalking · 05/07/2017 10:13

GrinGrinGrin

woodhill · 05/07/2017 10:23

Be thankful his hair isn't like Louis xiv in Versaille or Phillipe

To prevent DS channeling Richard III?
Fl0ellafunbags · 05/07/2017 10:25

Are you almost at the Blackadder stage with this haircut?

MyfanwyMontez · 05/07/2017 10:37

Sometimes a thread comes along that reminds why I love MN . This is one of those times.Thank you Cecily and allegretto for giving me a giggle. I will be tittering to myself all day now - and people already think I'm a bit odd!

Unicornsandrainbows3 · 05/07/2017 10:52

I now have this song in my head.
www.dailymotion.com/video/x2mcocz

Sadly no mention of his hair though.

SleepOhHowIMissYou · 05/07/2017 20:10

Mea culpa Rustybear!

Mind you, that does rather put paid to the idea that Richard murdered the little princes. That William Shakespeare's got a lot to answer.

RustyBear · 05/07/2017 21:24

Well, not really, Sleep - Richard took the crown from his nephew Edward V declaring him illegitimate (and therefore Elizabeth of York, his sister, too) due to his father Edward IV's precontract with Eleanor Butler, but he may still have decided it was safer to get rid of them anyway.

If they weren't already dead, Henry VII might have killed them after he seized the throne, so that he could declare Elizabeth legitimate. On the other hand, he was very keen not to give the idea that his claim to the throne depended on his marriage to Elizabeth, so it might not have worried him that there was any uncertainty.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page