My daughter returned home from school the other week looking solemn. When I asked her why, she revealed that the proposed ‘treat’ for the last day of term had been rescinded, because the class - as a whole - had ‘failed’ to reach the attendance goal of 95%.
As a working parent, my mother occasionally takes my kids to school, and upon questioning my daughter about this new ‘attendance challenge’ on the drop off, she was saddened to hear a voice pipe up behind her claiming responsibility – at least in part- for the fact that their class had missed out on the treat. The ‘culprit’? A 10 year old chronic asthma sufferer.
As a fairly tough mum of three, I’ve tried to bring up my children to know the value of going to school regularly, and have shrugged off the kids’ moans of being ‘too tired for school’ or having a ‘tummy ache’ that disappears when their favourite foods are presented. However, I do feel that if I decide my child is too ill to attend school, that child should not be treated or made to feel like they’ve done something wrong on their return. There is something inherently wrong about this, and it needs to be addressed. The whole ‘punishing all for the actions of one’ approach seems like something out of the military to me, and not something that should be practiced when attempting to shape young minds.
Whilst attendance challenges, award schemes and competitions between years are one thing, punishing a child because they have had the misfortune to fall ill – or making them feel that they should carry on regardless for the sake of their classmates isn’t helping.
I know that my children’s school is not the only one trying to shore up attendance figures to make the government’s requirements, and am well aware that there are cases where absenteeism needs to be addressed, but I for one, will never understand the point of rewarding pupils’ good fortune in staying germ free, whilst other children are suffering from chronic illness and being punished for it.