DS (18) asked if I would buy him his provisional license. DH said no and that he should buy stuff like that himself.
He's still at college and has worked on and off since the age of 14. He's just landed a new job which starts end of this month to do alongside his a-levels. He asked again about the provisional and DH said no as his son had to buy his own. This got me thinking, his son has never worked a day in his life and is not at college getting a bursary or anything so surely someone must have bought that for him? Even if it wasn't us? Either his mum (who he lives with) or out of money given to him by his grandma but the point is, it's not as if he's gone out and wasn't the money to buy it, is it? So why should DS have to?
This has happened a few times when I've wanted to buy DS something and DH has said no because we didn't do it for his kids (such as license, trips, even cinema etc) but when his kids come here they naturally talk about how their mum has bought them this and paid for that - DH says it's nothing to do with us what their mother pays for but doesn't seem to realise that I am my kids version of what his kids have with their mother!
I'm dreading him finding out about the licence but I don't think I was wrong to pay for it, was I?