Social services now. If you think it's wrong, feel it's wrong and can see it's wrong; it's wrong
No.
Just no.
This op is not about safeguarding concerns based on risk assessment and knowledge.
Its about value judgements based on differing view on what is adequate parenting.
Thresholds for SS interventions are high for a reason. The state cannot and should not dictate how parents care for their children unless they are causing harm and distress.
We have one of the most proactive children's services in the world. Many other countries simply do not get involved in family life and some that do are purely reactive. They don't go in 'just in case'.
Someone upthread said people get defensive on these threads because they fear it could happen to them.
Far more usual on MN is people calling 'REPORT' because they think it could never happen to them.
We have anti vaxxers, free birthers, those who refuse to feed their children solid food until they feel they are ready, homeschoolers, 'gentle' parents who will not set boundaries for their children and a whole host of seemingly acceptable MN parenting styles. Imagine the horror if they were reported by someone who though not vaccinating was abusive, not giving your kid a nice sausage when they are watching you eat was cruel, taking your child out of school was weird and suspicious etc etc.
Yet time and time again parents who live in 'one of those houses' or don't offer choices to their children, dress them in Asda clothes and let them eat junk food elicit calls to REPORT.
You need a reason to report a family to SS. There isn't one in the op.
Although 'AIBU to report the woman who looked like she was trying to abduct my kids' would be an interesting thread.