I never met someone from NM to discuss MN. Honest. Trump thread cont

[amispartacus]

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/2864604-FAKE-news-LIES-fake-lies-We-need-the-Trump-Oracle?msgid=67323987

MSNBC‏Verified account @MSNBC 2m2 minutes ago
More
Sen. Coons: 'Attorney General Sessions lied to the Senate' on.msnbc.com/2lLxkcW

This is all distraction, of course. They're getting panicky because the press is closing in.

Oh Yes.

Bless

In Raleigh, North Carolina

video.foxnews.com/v/5347713589001/?#sp=show-clips

Chad Sarno‏ @Wanderer19 52s52 seconds ago
This Democrat Just Perfectly Explained To Trump What His Wiretap Tweets Mean - occupydemocrats.com/2017/03/04/democrat-just-perfectly-explained-trump-wiretap-tweets-mean/ …

On the bright side this whole Trump business has brought to my attention the amazingness that is Mexican politicians. They have a frankly rather dishy president, the ex-president is ranty awesomeness on Twitter, and now this politition just straight up climbed the mexico-US border fence just to make a point about what an idiotic idea a wall is.

www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-39174159?ocid=socialflow_twitter

If this is accurate it looks like Putin is still draining his swamp in his very own style

So, instead of following the money, or the bread crumbs, we should follow the dead?

That Russian Ambassador better start preparing his "in the event of my death" letter.

Louise Mensch tweeting about it was a server located in Trump tower that was under investigation. Belongs to a Bank. With Russian connections.

I remember that from months ago, I think. If that's what he means, he's a bigger idiot than I thought.

There are quite a few reporters pointing out that by making it public knowledge, he's essentially declassified it, which means the information that he most likely doesn't want released will be released.

I love a good chart. This one from wapo shows links between trump posse, Russian ambassador and Russian businesses.

Nice public warning to the Bank and it's customers though. Effective stuff.

Michael LaRosa‏
@MichaelLaRosaDC
Producer of @Hardball with @HardballChris on @MSNBC
Follow
More
Sarah Huckabee Sanders: "I'll let the President speak for himself.

Martha Raddatz: "But you're his spokesperson!?"

Eric Lipton‏Verified account @EricLiptonNYT 7m7 minutes ago
Lots talk re White House "chaos." But something VERY big happening: Deconstruction of regulatory state. A NYT look
www.nytimes.com/2017/03/05/us/politics/trump-deregulation-guns-wall-st-climate.html …

Gosh. The GOP want it all done quickly don't they?

Make America Great Again

The more he says this, the more agitated he is...

Deregulation - coming to post Brexit UK soon.

Who needs pesky climate controlling, drug regulations, gun regulations, safety regulations, working time, maternity leave, holiday pay, financial regulations anyway?

Long time lurker first time poster...Anyone seen this from Louise Mensch on Twitter? Huge if true! Is impeachment growing ever more likely?

"Foreign intelligence services have handed over recordings and transcripts of Trump camp colluding with Russia, and info is new."

I guess that repealing and replacing the ACA, and building the Wall are proving more problematic than expected. They want the rest of their wish list rushed through.

I'd play more golf if I were him.

Why do you think they want their wish list through, Kitty?

Yes true, the GOP are obviously trying to get their radical agenda & possibly a supreme court justice through before the knives come out...Pretty reprehensible & calculated behaviour. And of course Pence has kept his fingerprints off the train wreck with a view to the future. The Trump administration feels like it's in its death-throes already.

Plus some profit taking on Wall St, I reckon.

If they did find that Trump had colluded with Russia during the campaign to the extent that it called into question the result of the election would they run it again? Or are we assuming that the Russia link will just implicate Trump and co. in dodgy dealings, but still leave the republicans as the election winners?

2018, Bigly. It's not far away now.

Sorry - the GOP would still be the winners. Temporarily.

Is my view.

Probably depends a bit on the revelations. We have no idea who's been involved and to what extent, and probably never really will do.

Wouldn't it be amazing to fast-forward a hundred years and read the various interpretations of WTF happened in the 2010s?