SanFranBear, I know, I keep having to double-check and consider the other point of view too.
But a couple of things stand out for me.
Completely separate from this Republican administration's policies, Trump's behaviour is clearly awry.
And because his extreme behaviour (obsessively self-aggrandizing, not interested in essential information, not understanding why his whim isn't law, not understanding the responsibilities as well as the privileges of the Office) is so far from what's needed to do the job, it's clear that the behaviour of the people who knew him well and still helped him into the job were just looking for a frontman - eg Bannon who got himself assigned to the NSC without Trump understanding what he was signing (supposedly). So that behaviour is waving red flags and sounding big red hooters, regardless of policy.
If you do consider policies... it's clear that he is doing the complete opposite of what he campaigned on, when it benefits him or his mates. Although he's happy to stir the emotional pot.
I understand the urge to normalise, to assume the truth must be half-way between where you are, and where he is. But there is no rule that it must be so. Indeed, trading on this urge to accommodate is why "The Big Lie" technique is so successful.
Of course it's also important to avoid the fallacy that any position or group which is anti-Trump must therefore be the correct answer: each policy or action still needs to be judged on its merit, just as always.
But I'm not having any difficulty at all judging the Trump White House to be not behaving commensurate with running a fully democratic, constitutional country, which abides by the rule of democratically created law.
At the moment, the White House looks more like the home of a god-king who thinks the USA is his private fiefdom.