If however you have a "naice" comfortable respectable life and want to dabble with the odd line of Coke etc or get paralytic every now and then to let your hair down - hell yeah I will judge you. Because it takes just that one time for you to die of alcohol poisoning or get a bad hit and fuck up your kids life forever - and you gamble that for FUN.
I'm sorry but this is just way over the top and shows a complete lack of understanding about the issue at hand.
I model substance misuse services for a living so am well briefed on risk/dangers/current trends etc. I also from time to time have a line of coke or (shock horror) take an e at a festival.
The new substance misuse services commissioned by the government are quite heavily focused on addressing the huge problem we have with alcohol as a country. This is the biggest cost both economically and to wider society. Some of you might be surprised to hear that in detox facilities nationally people withdrawing from alcohol heavily outweigh those withdrawing from drugs.
We have an ageing heroin using population which is dying out. Young people are much more likely to use MDMA and cocaine which get little attention in the service specifications I read (and in the past two years I have looked at least 25 services to include London, Leicester, Kent, Manchester, Nottingham...).
More of a problem is the Novel Psychoactive Substances (NPS) that technically aren't illegal being research chemicals not yet banned and far more dangerous. By far the most sensible thing to do would be to have a regulated system underpinned by a programme of harm reduction.
In a nutshell I would say there is very little risk in taking 'recreational drugs'. Of course there are going to be a few horror stories but overlaid with the huge damage alcohol has on our society they really are quite meaningless. There is a chasm between someone having a line of coke on a Friday night and a entrenched heroin user. Sadly the latter is much more like to have ended up in that position as a result of their social situation (poverty/limited life chances) rather than weed or similar acting as a gateway drug. I would also say that to move from using MDMA to more hardcore drugs is very very unusual as they are used in entirely different circumstances and for entirely different reasons.
The uproar about collateral damage is misplaced as well. The rise of the darknet means more and more people are buying directly from labs online shifting how the trade operates.
A large proportion of my peers (to include a deputy head, a pilot, a pharmacist, senior civil servants... I could go on) all use occasionally and do so with our eyes open. No distinction at all between alcohol and recreational drugs and I only hope for a future government who will put in place a sensible regulated system (as works so well in Portugal).
(Name changed btw)