Trifle what has been suggested is not, nor should it be, impossible. Your minority of girls could be 5 or 10 or 15% of half the school! And that percentage could go up or down any year. I see no evidence from your comments of any interest to change the status quo. No wonder PE is generally IMHO a very disliked subject!
Flying the fact some pioneering women managed doesn'really mean modern women need to put up with shit, we've been doing it for 5 millennium, when can it stop.
Your wiggling Willy syndrome could be sorted by some well made swim trunks maybe?
Sounds like education and testing is in a bit of a mess! Maybe the government should be looking into why the tax payer is paying for testing services that are not fit for purpose. People missing a test due to a bereavement or serious illness are just going to miss out? So they have had tax payer education but don't get tax payer paid for recognition because the body we fund to regulate this is not sufficiently flexible?
Maybe these should be issues heads should be discussing together; instead of worrying if little Benny in year 4 has a week's holiday in term time.
I am not blaming individual teachers! I just think education and testing is not set up for the benefit of pupils and that should be explored. It actually looks like a big can of worms and the deeper you dig the more wormy it gets!
Likewise agree uptgread the PE turns some/many off physical activity. Is there research into what approach works best in terms of participation and long term sports/physical fitness ability?
Maybe some big sports companies like Nike might be able to find unbiased research into how to make PE a really positive thing in the lives of young people.
So well done individual teachers for hard work.
Please push these issues upwards to heads, leadership teams or unions.
I am sure no teacher wants to prepare a child for an exam they will not be able to take, for any reason.