Koala, I didn't realise the Indigenous population was so low! That's actually shocked me more than the smoking rate.
The point I was clumsily trying to make was that lowish smoking prevalence overall can hide massive disparities between different demographic groups. Looking at the Australian data, people who are unable to work, lone parents and people who live in remote locations also have very high rates, as well as all the usual groups e.g. unemployed, low paid, people with MH issues, prisoners ... It's the same in most developed countries, especially those with high levels of inequality. Sorry for singling out Australia it was just a very stark example I'd read about recently.
In Australia and many other countries, smoking behaviour is inversely related to socio-economic status, with disadvantaged groups in the population being more likely to take up and continue smoking. The authors of a seminal British report on poverty and smoking observed that one can ‘almost study social disadvantage itself through variations in smoking prevalence’
I'm always a bit
when I read posts saying something like, 'Barely anyone smokes these days, I'm shocked when I see it, everybody knows it's unacceptable and everybody's OK with that ...' If you live and work somewhere fairly well-heeled and/or somewhere with stringent tobacco control laws it might not be that visible to you but I guarantee that not that far away, there will be communities where smoking is totally commonplace. And where people get sick and die in large numbers because of it.
I'm glad this thread is not so far bashing smokers much More often than not these days, if you're bashing smokers you're bashing people who have already been handed the pooey end of the stick in life, for one reason or another.