Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think it's expensive being single

235 replies

rainyinnovember · 01/11/2016 12:14

Mortgage / rent is more expensive
Council tax
Entertainment
Bills
Shopping

Or am I missing something

OP posts:
BeMorePanda · 02/11/2016 16:20

being a single parent is even more super expensive.

In fact the main reason I feel it is tough being a SP is having one income for 3 people, as opposed to my friends who have two incomes between 3 or 4 people.

Its a massive disadvantage.

rainyinnovember · 02/11/2016 16:22

It's possible to improve your situation but the situation may still be tough.

Someone who works in a MW job may save and have their savings taken away when the landlord sells and they need to fund moving costs again.

Your posts are a bit odd Pisseddddofff.

There is nothing to stop a single person saving or retraining but it's harder. Much harder.

OP posts:
QueenLizIII · 02/11/2016 16:24

i have improved my situation since then. my debts are paid. i have money in the bank but i didnt anticipate housing becoming unaffordable whilst paying off my student debt. so im.still screwed.

Zaphodsotherhead · 02/11/2016 16:30

I'm a bit old to retrain (new tricks old dogs springs to mind). I have a NMW job I love and am good at, and a second job which is artistic, in which I am well regarded (even slightly famous within a limited circle) but in which earnings can vary wildly. I've raised five kids pretty much alone, four of whom have got very good degrees, and all of whom are employed. I don't owe anyone any money, and, apart from not being able to afford heating, life is pretty good.

I did have savings once, but raising five kids was expensive. And because my earnings can fluctuate so much, any money put away one month will be spent making the following month's shortfall. Rural living is expensive, running a car is expensive. If I had someone to share the costs with, I'd only be half as broke!

Pisssssedofff · 02/11/2016 16:40

Nobody is saying it's not harder, what I guess I find frustrating is the defeatist attitude. It's not impossible, difficult yes of course but it's still a choice.

I'm retraining at 41, I am struggling with technology the guys in my groups use like a reflex, but the alternative is what exactly? Moan the government won't help me when the kids have left home ?

rainyinnovember · 02/11/2016 16:42

No defeatist attitude, from who? Me? I have (deliberately) said very little about my own circumstances and I certainly haven't mentioned benefits. I'm a bit irritated by your attitude to be honest which I consider a bit hypocritical but there we go.

OP posts:
Pisssssedofff · 02/11/2016 16:44

My attitude is if you aren't happy in your circumstances, change them. Whatever they may be. Thousands of people have to exactly that every day.

rainyinnovember · 02/11/2016 16:45

They do, yes, and it's harder for some people than it is for others. Why you seem to find that so contentious I don't know!

OP posts:
QueenLizIII · 02/11/2016 16:49

it isnt a defeatist attitude.

ive done the sums and i physically cannot do it by myself. afford full rent or mortgage all the bills etc.

if there were two of us it'd be fine

Pisssssedofff · 02/11/2016 16:51

Lol I don't find it contentious, I've repeatedly acknowledged it's difficult. What I don't accept is that it's impossible.

Over and out.

Zaphodsotherhead · 02/11/2016 16:59

Well, that escalated quickly...

rainyinnovember · 02/11/2016 17:02

Oh, did it? A small amount of contention from a poster who has tried to be goady from the start over a day and a half?

OP posts:
ego147 · 02/11/2016 17:14

Moan the government won't help me when the kids have left home

Back to the OP - would you be able to save more money if

a) You were in a couple and both kids have left home

b) Were single and both kids have left home?

The couple both have earning potential but the living expenses are proportionally less than the single person - even though the children have both left.

People in a couple can earn / save more money than a single person.

ChocolateWombat · 02/11/2016 17:23

Quite simply, a couple can bring in double the money, but it doesn't cost double the amount for a couple to live, compared to a single person.

Yes, food, bills etc are more expensive for 2 than 1 but not double by any means.

Many couples live in accommodation that a single might live in - the bills might be slightly higher, but not much - so the cost is halved per person.
Holidays charge single person supplements, boosting the cost
Single people buy in Les bulk which is more expensive
Gift giving is more expensive per head usually, and you might find you buy for 5 members of a family - but they only get 1 present for you between them.
Harder to get a big enough mortgage.

It is hard being single financially hard.

user1473509591 · 02/11/2016 17:25

My relationship costs me a fortune 😂 I'm sole earner so when it's my birthday, I'm essentially buying my own present. When we go out for dinner I pay for a family of 4 rather than a meal for 3. I don't mind though:)

rainyinnovember · 02/11/2016 17:45

Well, no it doesn't user.

You have children so I presume your partner saves you in childcare costs.

OP posts:
ego147 · 02/11/2016 17:52

rainy

Indeed. If someone is not earning money through work, then they are hopefully saving 'the family' money through reduced childcare costs elsewhere.

rainyinnovember · 02/11/2016 17:55

My husband sometimes makes the complaint about me costing a fortune and it's a really shitty thing to say, even in jest.

OP posts:
ego147 · 02/11/2016 18:15

My husband sometimes makes the complaint about me costing a fortune and it's a really shitty thing to say, even in jest

That is shitty.

The main thing in my house that costs a fortune is DS Grin

But he's worth it......

rainyinnovember · 02/11/2016 19:00

Yes, our children cost a fortune too. I suppose they are worth it Wink

OP posts:
ChocolateWombat · 02/11/2016 21:10

Isn't the real comparison of cost between single people and couples without kids?

Clearly kids cost....older ones even more and obv large fa,likes tend to cost more than small ones.

But it is a fact that 2 adults can bring in double 1 adult,whilst the living costs are not double.

rainyinnovember · 02/11/2016 21:12

I think having children is more of a choice, whereas being single isn't.

OP posts:
Gwenhwyfar · 03/11/2016 00:14

"I pay for Netflix which Is about £15 a month "

What? Netflix is 5.99 a month.

Gwenhwyfar · 03/11/2016 00:17

" Meals out, cinema tickets, drinks at the pub etc are no cheaper for couples."

No, but couples don't need to go out to get some company. For me as a single person, I either stay in alone or I go out to see friends, which means spending money.

Gwenhwyfar · 03/11/2016 00:22

" You say things like "council tax is cheaper split 2 ways" but many couples only have one income, so its not split two ways. "

If someone isn't working they would be entitled to some kind of benefits unless their partner's income is at a certain level. The costs are still split between two adults who have the possibility of either working or claiming benefits.

Swipe left for the next trending thread