I find this all so distasteful.
Can we not just talk about this on the basis of actual, scientific, peer-reviewed evidence?
Which according to my literature review, tells us this:
A tiny minority of children who receive vaccinations - for flu or other infective agents - will suffer adverse effects and possible life-altering injuries.
The overwhelming majority of children who receive vaccinations will not suffer adverse effects.
The reduction in deaths attributable to flu, or serious disability from flu, outweigh, statistically speaking, the number of cases of vaccine damage or serious adverse effects from flu vaccination when the data's looked at for, say 10 years. Note: this does NOT mean that deaths or serious disablement from vaccine damage are insignificant. They are heartbreaking for all concerned. But then so are avoidable death and disability from flu - and there are more of those.
The flu vaccination varies in efficacy from year to year.
The mortality rates and rate of sequelae from flu is much higher at population level than the rate of flu vaccine damage, at population level.
And that's it.
Vaccinate, don't vaccinate, whatever, but if you disagree with the above, then what evidence are you using to back up your argument? I am completely willing to engage seriously with anyone who presents credible evidence reaching different conclusions to the above. It's just that no-one ever cites it 