There's no need to keep emotion out of things. There is a need, in discussion, to be able to express emotion civilly.
But the labelling of emotion as inferior and invalid and feminine is one of the ways patriarchy sidelines women's concerns (and those of many men). Emotions and feelings are valid information about a situation.
All the "empathic, we are all one stuff' is often a way of escaping the very valid, and very painful emotions a person feels after being abuse.
Some of the way you are coming across is almost like you are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome- you emphasise with your captors/oppressors as a survival mechanism. (And, historically, if you look at the levels of female abduction/bride stealing etc, it's a very important survival mechanism for women. Everyone knows about fight or flight, a lot know about freeze, and fewer about fawn as a response to potentially life threatening situations. For women, and also children, both freeze and fawn are underexplored survival mechanisms linked to different parts of the nervous system than fight/flight).
If you are an abused woman, and not an MRA, then I suggest you get some counselling and help to deal with the emotions that you feel as a result of the abuse. Even if you have already had some, these attempts to sideline emotion and rise above it all can be a really bad sign of where you really are inside.