But Francis, the theatre let her in with her baby, so suitability for a baby is clearly not an issue.
It really doesn't matter to babies that the subject matter is 'adult'.
I wasn't there. If I had been there and happened to be sitting next to this woman and her screaming, hungry, wriggling child after paying £50 per head to see what is essentially an adult show, I would definitely complain.
Correct, you weren't there.
But you confidently describe a screaming, hungry, wriggling child.
Are you clairvoyant?
Hospitals are usually hot, sweaty, packed full of people. Yet babies are frequently born in them. Doctors' waiting rooms ditto, and the same goes for buses, and planes, and pool changing rooms. The vast majority of the world's population lives in places that are hot, sweaty, and packed full of people.
And you haven't answered my question related to this particular wording:
As for BF in the auditorium... Don't get me started.
Maybe you realise you have outed yourself as someone with a bee in her bonnet about public breastfeeding?
This theatre was not packed by any stretch of the imagination, according to the article.
For some, having a baby with then makes them imagine they have got a trump card that enforces their perceived right to do what they want.
Someone else with a bee in her bonnet about the temerity of mothers who think they can occupy space outside of their homes when they have a baby in tow.
The absolute cheek of them!