No actually, I didn't mean that. I meant exactly what I said.
And, as I made clear in the rest of my post, it is by no means clear that the vicar did say anything along the lines of what you are inferring.
Which (along with the way they were talking) was why I considered it bitchy moaning rather than legitimate concern. There is no evidence at all that the vicar said his beliefs were the one true belief. There is no evidence he said "it was all true" (other than the word of one 4 year old. The other mother responded by saying her child hadn't said he'd said that and it was 'appalling he had').
But I see no reason that a vicar, in the context of a Christmas assembly, should stress again and again that he believes one thing and others believe others. Just as I wouldn't expect the rabbi to do so when he gives an assembly. Or any other faith leader. He was there to talk about the beliefs surrounding Christmas. And there is no evidence he did anything but do that.
And again, these were two parents who were very, very happy to have their children singing about how a special child was born to save the word a week earlier. If you are going to complain about religion, remove your child. Don't keep them in for the bits you think are cute.
They are also the same parents who teach their child Father Christmas is real, despite it not only not being true but not even believing it is true themselves. Though that's a whole other can of worms.
I really don't mind if people don't want their child involved in any religious aspects of Christmas. But the hypocrisy bugs me.