I didn't think there was anything that bad on RO thread but I'm afraid to say her name as I posted a couple of times, nothing that bad, on another media site about her, as did many people, saying that I didn't find her that watchable, found her image fake and found her a very unappealing manufactured product, and was banned.
The same thing happened as on the thread last night - several new posters joining the thread to say how wonderful and beautiful and young and talented she was, and that any criticism of her was anti-feminist. Very similar script.
I find that sort of monitoring of the media far more sinister than any fake allegations of anti-feminism by a pop industry product whose team are trying to make a lot of money out of by controlling her media image.
I see the above comments as far more to do with control of the pop industry and getting young, impressionable people to part with their money so that a select few can enjoy the proceeds, not nasty or anti-feminist, and as such very valid criticism of the industry as a whole. In terms of pr, I would say its not a very good approach if its producing such a lot of vitriol on a regular basis and the people behind it need to look at their product placement and whether the model is as valid in the UK as in the US. Although even in the US I've heard comments that the invitations to big name bashes are viewed with increasing scepticism.