permentrecord
I think most people are easily influenced by media, and that's back up by a fair bit of psychology. The majority of the press is owned by the same 'side' so to speak- sure people who have set left wing ethos can seak out left wing publications, but for many undecided, or perhaps unconfirmed, the significant and mostly unquestioned bias has an effect.
I never disputed this, what I'm disputing is this frequently used bogeyman that the only reason the current government got in was because of some sustained propaganda that only those on the left can see through, you will be hard pressed to find any unbiased news source anywhere in print and even with the advent of social media they have inherently become echoe chambers which both left and right are guilty of.
You only have to look at MN before the election and the aftermath afterwards to see an example of this, if MN was representative I think we would have had a Green/lab coalition government?
i posted the yougov poll of how we actually voted, depending on how you view stats you can see that people who read the papers do follow the bias of the paper, but there is a small percentage of each paper who vote for the opposition, these haven't fallen for the propaganda have they? The guardianistas who vote conservative or the sun/Mail reader who vote labour, papers and news outlets always push and set an agenda, but there is also the opposite of the public that dictates and sways the narrative of the press (although not as much admittedly)
I stand by my assertion that you are implying that people are only informed if they vote the way you approve of.
As for me we have a household income of ~140k and voted Lib Dem