The thing is though, how would you actually know whether someone was using contraception or not? There is no way to tell whether a woman is using hormonal contraception, even through a blood test, as the hormones are too easily mixed up with ones a woman has naturally.
It seems very odd to me to not take someone's word for it when she says she will not have sex but at the same time have no problem taking someone's word for it when they say they are going to use contraception. What's the difference?
And what happens when a woman does use contraception but ends up pregnant anyway? Would you still judge her for being stupid and selfish? Would you just assume she was lying about using contraception? And then judge her even more?
I took roaccutane about five years ago now. Prior to starting treatment I had already been on the pill anyways even though at the time I had never been sexually active and had no plans to have sex. I took the pill to help my heavy periods and as I had no problems with it I was happy to continue taking it throughout my course of treatment.
About a month into treatment I was raped. I was still on the pill at the time and I always took it correctly -- at the same time every day and never missed one. However my contraception failed and I did end up falling pregnant as a result.
I did have an abortion but the amount of judgement I got was unbelievable. Even my own dermatologist questioned me non-stop about it -- "are you sure you were really on the pill?", "are you sure you took it correctly?", "are you really sure you did this, that, blah blah blah". All of this questioning came with lots of raised eyebrows and lots of "hmms". It was clear she didn't believe me. I also had similar from other HCP's.
It was a horrible time for me. I was already going through enough as it was and the last thing I needed was all the disbelief and judgement.
Obviously I ended up pregnant which means I was still added to the statistics of women who fell pregnant whilst taking roaccutane. And as AFAIK they don't categorise those stats by saying this % was raped and not on contraception, this % was raped but her contraception failed, this % was just plain careless. It all gets lumped in together.
Then of course I terminated which probably meant I was added to some other statistic. I am sure there were lots of people who judged without knowing what had really happened.
I did everything I could to stop getting pregnant and I didn't even want to have sex in the first place but that didn't work.
It pisses me off that situations likes mine aren't taken into consideration and I just get lumped together with women who slept around and were careless with contraception. I doubt I'm the only woman in the world who was careful with contraception and might not even have wanted sex but ended up pregnant anyway.
Saying that I and other women in my situation might make roaccutane a target of anti abortion campaigners is offensive and hurtful. As is saying that we will be responsible if it gets withdrawn completely or just withdrawn from women, etc.
There is already so much victim blaming when it comes to rape. I still kind of blame myself for it sometimes but know deep down it wasn't my fault. It took me a long time to realise that however.
Adding even more blame and trying to guilt people by saying "it is your fault if it gets withdrawn. It doesn't matter that you were just unlucky and in the wrong place at the wrong time, it is still your fault and you will be held responsible" is just not on.