My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

MNHQ have commented on this thread

AIBU?

if you can't afford the children you have you shouldn't have more?

401 replies

Lady1nred · 04/06/2015 16:24

was speaking to a couple I know today, both out of work and living on benifits. They have 3 children and they are very vocal about how awful it is that they barely get enough money to survive. It turn out that she is now pregnant with their 4th child! This was planned and they are delighted?! They use food banks and thir children have every gadget and toy known to man!

When I asked how on earth they will manage with another child she blatantly said the money they recieve will go up and that it is her right to have as many children as she likes?!!

I have 2DC, I would love a 3rd but we would struggle finNcislly so have made the decision not to. I believe benifits should be capped at 2 children, she obviously doesn't agree! If she can't afford to pay for the children she has why should I go without yet pay for hers through my taxes? AIBU?

OP posts:
Report
BishopBrennansArse · 04/06/2015 22:14

It's fine Fizzie. Stop being indignant because they're putting a stop to it - they're also destroying families with disabled members too who are completely reliant on help.

But as long as you get to feel all is right with the world that's ok.

Oh, and the 'goat' might be tedious, but nowhere near as tedious as threads like this are to families with disabled family members who are reliant on benefits then treated like scum.

Report
TheOnlyOliviaMumsnet · 04/06/2015 22:19

@The5DayChicken

There's a possibility that dear Olivia has just started backtracking to see who's tried to frighten the OP.


No. no
Olivia has just started on the gin.
Report
MrsDeVere · 04/06/2015 22:20

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Taja123 · 04/06/2015 22:21

I hear your but think maybe one day one if these children may be the surgeon saving my life in years to come after receiving an education and upbringing that my taxes helped pay for xx it's frustrating but one can only hope the cycle doesn't continue I suffer not the children

Report
BMW6 · 04/06/2015 22:22

Lady in Red I have 4 siblings. As posted earlier, Dad wouldn;t use a condom. I suppose it's lucky that there wasn;t more of us.........

Report
BMW6 · 04/06/2015 22:32

MrsDeVere
Exactly. Who was to blame for our crap childhoods? - Government? No. Our parents? Yes.
What I want is for parents to take resposibility for their children.

Not a "strop". More of a rage actually.

Report
The5DayChicken · 04/06/2015 22:37

Good call on the gin Olivia Grin

Report
ilovesooty · 04/06/2015 22:39

No peace and love then Grin

Report
MrsDeVere · 04/06/2015 22:46

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

BMW6 · 04/06/2015 22:48

oh I forgot to answer your question Mrs de Vere "what do I want"........

Parents to take responsibility. No-one else should.

Report
AldiQ7 · 04/06/2015 22:50

Hmmm, the concept of 'personal responsibility' does seem a little bit alien on mumsnet sometimes.

Having said that, people such as those described in the OP are not exactly living the life of Riley by any stretch of the imagination. They obviously aren't actually having more kids for 'the money', most of these people are piss poor. So there must be other reasons for them to continue to churn out children that they can't afford - lack of education, lack of any sense of personal responsibility because of the circumstances they were brought up in themselves, I don't know. But there isn't really any point in judging them, they are not 'bad' people, it's just part of a cycle that is very hard to break.

I know a woman (really I do!) who has just given birth to her eighth child by a fourth (dickhead) father. 3 of her kids have SN, and there are various behaviour issues, fairly chaotic home life etc. People are very judgmental of her and are just like 'stop having children woman, you can't look after the ones you have'. But the thing is, she was probably brought up in similar circumstances and thinks that is what is normal and I imagine her kids will go on to do similar.

I don't really know what the answer is, but as others have said, once the kids are here, they deserve to be looked after/paid for/educated as much as any other child.

Report
BMW6 · 04/06/2015 22:53

Well, in that case the children should be taken away from the irresponsible cunt parent.

Report
ghostspirit · 04/06/2015 22:54

so its true you get a goat if your on benefits...is it true you also get free carpets if on benefits.

should only have children if can afford them. i wonder how many familys could afford their children at the time but cant now....

Report
usualsuspect333 · 04/06/2015 22:58

Taken away to where? Put into care?

Report
Oswin · 04/06/2015 22:58

So BMW6 you would be fine with all the children of people who are on benefits being plunged into the same poverty you experienced as a child? That does not shine you in a nice light tbh.
There is no way on earth that the care system would cope.
There isn't enough foster homes as it is.
So children would go hungry.
Ahh that's ok better to teach them feckless parents some responsibility eh.

Report
AnyoneForTennis · 04/06/2015 23:00

How would children go hungry?

Report
WinterOfOurDiscountTents15 · 04/06/2015 23:00

If we take all of the children away from all of the poor and a possibly feckless parents...what do we do with them? Thats gonna be a lot of kids, and not nearly enough places to put them. Which, btw, would cost a LOT more than the benefits paid to the parents. What's your plan for them?

Report
PtolemysNeedle · 04/06/2015 23:00

Why do we have to accept that people will always have children they can't afford though?

I can understand why it happened in the past, but nowadays people have free access to a range of contraceptives, and the MAP, and they are a lot more informed about the alternative ways of life. It does just show selfishness and stupidity and those aren't things that our society should actively encourage.

Report
The5DayChicken · 04/06/2015 23:01

You know putting the children into care is more expensive than increasing the amount of benefits a parent receives, right BMW? And that just because a child is born to an irresponsible pair of parents, it doesn't necessarily mean that they're not in a loving home?

Report
MrsDeVere · 04/06/2015 23:02

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LuisSuarezTeeth · 04/06/2015 23:02

My friend has 12 children by 11 different fathers. After calculating her housing costs and utilities, she figured she needed another two to make a profit.

After some searching online, she identified a potential father. They met up, got on well, had sex...well we're still waiting to hear. But my friend is so hoping that THIS child could be the one that breaks even. If that happens, the sky's the limit!

Report
SurlyCue · 04/06/2015 23:06

Well, in that case the children should be taken away from the irresponsible cunt parent.

To where? Are you offering to have them?

How would children go hungry?

Really? You cant think that one through by yourself?

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

MrsDeVere · 04/06/2015 23:07

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

The5DayChicken · 04/06/2015 23:07

Luis, the only question I have is who looked after the dozen children while she went looking for the donor for number 13? Hmm

Report
MrsDeVere · 04/06/2015 23:08

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.