And Chandler, what you're saying is only partly true. In fact the Danish raise pigs for the UK separately from the pigs they produce for other countries, precisely because of concerns in the UK over animal welfare in Denmark. So people in the UK might be getting more ethical meat, but people elsewhere aren't. Yes, the Danish have improved standards over recent years, however. But it's a classic example.
precisely - no, you are wrong. You really need to make the effort to read up about the subject you are waffling on about. Denmark is the leading country in BANNING non-stun slaughter, and is leading the way in Europe towards more ethical pig farming methods. Don't confuse indoor rearing with factory farming either.
90% of Danish pig produce is exported, the majority to other EU Member States, and it accounts for around half of all Danish agricultural products and 5% of Denmark's total exports. Denmark also prides itself on high food safety standards and good animal health. The "Male-Pig-Projekt" initiative in Danish pig farming was designed to raise profit margins and reduce distress to pigs resulting from the process of castration. This involved farming uncastrated pigs, despite the risk of the meat producing a smell (or so-called "boar taint") of the male sex hormone androstenone when heated or cooked. According to Danish researchers, the presence of boar taint could be detected by measuring the skatol content of the carcass at the time of slaughter, and all Danish slaughter lines were fitted with skatol measuring equipment to enable meat affected to be identified and rejected.
The Danish pig-farming industry has done much research into the issue, finding that castration caused pain from tissue-tearing and analgesia which was not always applied, that immunocastration caused delayed effects and needle-distress, and that anaesthetic was too difficult to apply to young male pigs and caused an unacceptable risk to humans, and that all methods only took into account market preferences and not animal welfare concerns. Obviously it there were also considerable cost savings in not castrating stock, although Denmark is one of the EU leaders in trying to move away from heavy use of medication in the meat industry. It was found that certain markets in the EU were more sensitive to boar taint than others and that the reasons for this might include dietary and smoking habits in those Member States. The UK by contrast does not castrate pigs intended for human consumption at all.
The Danes have done a lot of research into this, which you might be wise to familiarise yourself with. Try Bekaert, K.M., et al (2011). “The sensitivity of Flemish citizens to androstenone: Influence of gender, age, location and smoking habits.” Meat Science, 88, p. 548-552; Hansen-Møller, Jens and Andersen, Jan Rud (1994). “Boar taint; analytical alternatives.” Danish Meat Research Institute, Manuscript No. 1209 E; Jensen, Werner Klinth (1998). “Skatole and boar taint. Results from an integrated national research project investigating causes of boar taint in Danish pigs.” Danish Meat Research Institute, Roskilde.
I think there is a big emphasis on the far east (especially China) in the press but not on other countries where exactly the same thing goes on. Why the emphasis on China? It's got to be something to do with politics.
Come now. The vast area that is currently contained within the nation of China is hardly homogenous and contains many disparate cultures alongside that of mainstream Chinese, with the same attitudes towards a very specific culture towards animals and eating certain types of meat.