The expat community in Europe are largely self funding and contributing to the local economy. This is surely just a scaremongering thread.
Expat is a lexical fig leaf. Used a lot to draw a line of distinction between "scummy economic migrants" and "naice people". Expat will be plonked on me by distinction of being British. Yet a Pole with a degree (compared to my four poxy O levels) and a career (compared to my 2.5 decades of self employed, often quite precarious TEFLing) will be plonked in the economic migrant box.
That linguistic gymnastics is no reflection of reality. It's just a game of delusion to better fit one's own sense of inate superiority. It's time to retire the bugger. You live outside the country of your birth full time, you are an immigrant. You moved for economic motives, you are an economic migrant. "Expat" as it is currently used should die with the Empire.
Or we could retire immigrant/economic migrant and call everybody "expat".
But one, or the other. Enough of this two tiered system that is based on nothing more substantial than national arrogance and othering. If we want to define between differing types of immigrants and understand the what, where, who, why, when we need something more useful in terms of data than "are you from an anglophone country old chap? or just the "right kind" of white ?"
Its use has created a nationalistic blindness. Britons living in EU other are a diverse bunch. It's not all pensioners who burn money as entertainment and air kissing in Chianti-shire types not all are self funding
Many many more Britons will stop being self funding if they lose their jobs where they are now, because they will lose the right to live and work where they have built a life. And Britain has a welfare system that plenty of countries they are leaving do not. So... some in their post-rug-pulled-from-under-me state, released from the do-or-die reality of "no comparable safety net", will languish on state funds as they peer from the rubble of what they had built for themselves.
Here's a thought. How about instead of just guessing and doing little bits of research, before a referendum is announced Britian takes steps to thoughly investigate its diaspora and understand its make up before blithely assuming most of us will get to stay, and even if we don't our "large cushions of money" will mean the state doesn't have to mop up the fall out and it's all basically no harm, no foul. If we really are that homogenous and well off, should be a pretty easy task, so not so onerous a request in terms of "just to be on the safe side".
Think if you do, you are in for a shock.
I am an economic migrant. I left to have a crack at the whip at earning enough to live on. Because Britain could not offer me that. Twice.
I am far far far from lonely in my British economic migrant box.
Even if the bulk of my box dwellers do insist on using the term expat to self describe.
If it is scaremongering, show me where millions have been forced to give up everything they have worked for in terms of creating a stable life for themselves and their families, and then had it ripped away via a repatriation they did not freely chose, and everything was just fine with no upset, no negative ramifications, no long standing/large scale resentments, no international bad feeling, no unrest and no human cost.